Ильяшенко А.Н.

Животноводство и кормопроизводство. 2026. Т. 109. № 3. С. 267-293.

 

Обзорная статья

УДК 636.5:577.15

doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-109-3-267

 

Мультиферментный комплекс «Натузим» в кормлении мясной птицы

 

Артур Николаевич Ильяшенко1

1Bioproton Europe Oy, Москва, Россия

1arturbio@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-5180

 

Аннотация. В настоящее время в России и во всем мире ферментные препараты активно применяют в кормлении птицы. Их включение в рационы способствует повышению эффективности использования питательных веществ и позволяет достичь высоких показателей продуктивности при меньших затратах. Это особенно актуально, когда речь идет о цыплятах, пищеварительная система которых находится в стадии формирования и не может справиться с перевариванием клетчатки, фитатов, растительного протеина и крахмала. Идеальным средством для решения этой проблемы являются мультиферментные комплексы. Благодаря разнообразию энзимный активностей, они оказывают комплексное воздействие на корма, что позволяет извлечь максимальное количество энергии, питательных и минеральных веществ, необходимых для быстрого роста развивающегося цыпленка. Натузим – мультиферментная добавка, действие которой хорошо изучено на мясной птице, особенно на цыплятах-бройлерах, в различных аспектах выращивания, таких как кормление, здоровье, качество мясной продукции и экономика производства.

Ключевые слова: цыплята-бройлеры, кормление, мультиферментный комплекс, Натузим, фермент

            Для цитирования: Ильяшенко А.Н. Мультиферментный комплекс «Натузим» в кормлении мясной птицы (обзор) // Животноводство  и  кормопроизводство. 2026. Т. 109. № 3. С. 267-293. [Ilyashenko AN. The multi-enzyme complex Natuzyme in feeding meat poultry (review). Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2026;109(3):267-293. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-109-3-267

Список источников

  1. Доника И.В., Федюк В.В., Семенченко С.В. Откормочные и мясные качества индюшат кросса Биг-6 при использовании ферментного препарата «Натузим» // Вестник Мичуринского государственного аграрного университета. № 4(71). С. 157-160. [Donika IV, Fedyuk VV, Semenchenko SV. Fattening and meat qualities of Turkeys of the Big-6 cross when using the enzyme preparation «Natuzyme». The Bulletin of Michurinsk State Agrarian University. 2022a;4(71):157-160. (In Russ.)].
  2. Доника И.В., Федюк Е.И. Применение ферментного препарата "Натузим" при промышленном выращивании индейки // Вестнике Донского государственного аграрного университета. 2022. № 2(44). С.70-79. [Donika IV, Fedyuk EI. The use of the enzyme preparation "Natuzim" in the industrial raising of Turkey. Bulletin of Don State Agrarian University. 2022;2(44):70-79. (In Russ.)].
  3. Драганов И.Ф., Рабаданова Г.Ш. Белковый обмен у бройлеров при введении в рацион ферментного препарата Натузим // Птица и птицепродукты. № 3. С. 29-33. [Draganov IF, Rabadanova GSh. Belkovy`j obmen u brojlerov pri vvedenii v racion fermentnogo preparata Natuzim. Poultry & Chicken Products. 2011a;3:29-33. (In Russ.)].
  4. Драганов И.Ф., Рабаданова Г.Ш. Влияние мультиферментного препарата на обмен веществ у цыплят-бройлеров // Проблемы биологии продуктивных животных. 2011б. № 3. С.105-113. [Draganov IF, Rabadanova GSh. Effects of multienzyme preparation on metabolism and performance in chicken-broilers. Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2011b;3:105-113. (In Russ.)].
  5. Иванов А.А., Ильяшенко А.Н. Ca и Mn в трубчатых костях цыплят-бройлеров в ранний постнатальный период при введении в рацион БАД // Ветеринария и кормление. № 4. С.38-40. [Ivanov AA, Il`yashenko AN. Ca i Mn v trubchaty`x kostyax cyplyat-brojlerov v rannij postnatal`ny`j period pri vvedenii v racion BAD. Veterinariya i kormlenie. 2011a;4:38-40. (In Russ.)].
  6. Иванов А.А., Ильяшенко А.Н. Рост, развитие и формирование скелета цыплят-бройлеров при включении в рацион кофакторов минерального обмена // Известия Тимирязевской сельскохозяйственной академии. 2011б. № 4. С.114-130. [Ivanov AA, Il`yashenko AN. Rost, razvitie i formirovanie skeleta cyplyat-brojlerov pri vklyuchenii v racion kofaktorov mineral`nogo obmena. Izvestiya TSXA, 2011b;4:114-130. (In Russ.)].
  7. Иванов А.А., Ильяшенко А.Н., Семак А.Э. Применение БАД при выращивании бройлеров // Птицеводство. № 6. С. 29-31. [Ivanov AA, Il`yashenko AN, Semak AE`. Primenenie BAD pri vy`rashhivanii brojlerov. Ptitsevodstvo. 2011;6:29-31. (In Russ.)].
  8. Иванов А.А., Ильяшенко А.Н. Формирование минерального состава костной ткани цыплят-бройлеров при включении в их рацион регуляторов минерального обмена / Известия ТСХА // 2010. № 3. С. 115-119. [Ivanov AA, Il`yashenko AN. Formirovanie mineral`nogo sostava kostnoj tkani cyplyat-brojlerov pri vklyuchenii v ix racion regulyatorov mineral`nogo obmena. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2010;3:115-119. (In Russ.)].
  9. Ильяшенко А.Н. Влияние мультиферментной добавки «Натузим» на усвояемость протеина корма  у  цыплят-бройлеров  в  постнатальном онтогенезе // Аграрная наука. № 356(2). С. 32-36. [Ilyashenko AN. Influence of the multi-enzyme additive “Natuzyme” on the digestibility of feed protein  in  broiler chickens in postnatal ontogenesis. Agrarian science. 2022;356(2):32-36. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2022-356-2-32-36
  10. Ильяшенко А.Н. Эффективная стратегия применения ферментов в кормлении свиней от компании Bioproton // Наше сельское хозяйство. № 4 (324). С. 32-35. [Il`yashenko AN. E`ffektivnaya strategiya primeneniya fermentov v kormlenii svinej ot kompanii Bioproton. Nashe sel'skoe hozyajstvo. 2024;4(324):32-35. (In Russ.)].
  11. Использование нетрадиционного кормового сырья в рационах гусей / И.Р. Тлецерук, Д.В. Осепчук, С.И. Кононенко, Н.А. Юрина // Инновации и современные технологии в производстве и переработке сельскохозяйственной продукции: материалы междунар. науч.-практ. конф. (Ставрополь, 25 нояб. 2016 г.). Ставрополь: Ставропольский гос. аграрный ун-т, 2016. C. 475-481. [Tletseruk IR, Osepchuk DV, Kononenko SI, Yurina NA. The use of non-traditional raw materials in feed rations geese. (Conference proceedings) Innovacii i sovremenny`e texnologii v proizvodstve i pererabotke sel`skoxozyajstvennoj produkcii: materialy` mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (Stavropol`, 25 noyab. 2016 g.). Stavropol`: Stavropol`skij gosudarstvenny`j agrarny`j universitet; 2016:475-481. (In Russ.)].
  12. Немер В.В.М., Тарабрин И.В. Продуктивность и сохранность цыплят-бройлеров при использовании ферментных препаратов в рационе // Вестник Донского государственного аграрного университета. №1(59). С.117-124. [Nemer VVM, Tarabrin IV. Productivity and safety of broiler chickens when using enzyme preparations in the diet. Don State Agrarian University. 2026;1(59):117-124. (In Russ.)].
  13. Нечитайло К.С., Сизова Е.А. Влияние мультиэнзимной кормовой добавки на продуктивные показатели, переваримость и химический состав тела цыплят-бройлеров // Животноводство и кормопроизводство. Т. 104. № 4. С.148-157. [Nechitajlo KS, Sizova EA. Effect of a multi-enzyme feed additive on productivity, digestibility and body chemistry of broiler chickens. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2021;104(4):148-157. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-104-4-148
  14. Рост и развитие индеек при использовании в рационе кормления ферментной добавки «Натузим» / И.В. Доника, В.В. Федюк, С.В. Семенченко, И.В. Засемчук // Вестник Мичуринского государственного аграрного университета. № 1(68). C. 170-174. [Donika IV, Fedyuk VV, Semenchenko SV, Zasemchuk IV. The growth and development of Turkeys when used in the diet of feeding the enzyme supplement «Natuzim». Bulletin of Michurinsk State Agrarian University. 2022b;1(68):170-174. (In Russ.)].
  15. Ababor S, Tamiru M, Alkhtib A, Wamatu J, Kuyu CG, Teka TA, Terefe LA, Burton E. The use of biologically converted agricultural byproducts in chicken nutrition. Sustainability. 2023;15(19):14562. doi: 10.3390/su151914562
  16. Abu-Tayyeb M, Jahan I, Hossain MA, Hossain MM, Akter N, Nath BK. The responses of exogenous enzymes (multi-enzymes) on the productivity and stage of production of broilers fed vegetable-sourced diets. Int J Poult Sci. 2019;18(11):515-522. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2019.515.522
  17. Ahiwe EU, Ejiofor I, Iwuji TC, Ahamba IS, Giwa AL. Flock uniformity, blood indices, and nutrient retention of broiler chickens fed low energy and protein diets supplemented with multi-enzyme. Poultry Science Journal. 2023;11(1):29-37. doi: 10.22069/psj.2022.20102.1802
  18. Ahiwe EU, Iwuji TC, Egenuka FC, Okehie UN, Ejifor I, Peter-Onoh CA, Ogbuewu IP, Emenalom OO. Performance and blood indices of broilers fed diets containing fermented citrus sinensis (orange) pulp supplemented with or without multi-enzyme. Trop J Nat Prod Res. 2025;9(11):5855-5862. doi: 10.26538/tjnpr/v9i11.78
  19. Alabi OO, Animashahun RA, Shoyombo AJ, Babalola AJ. The histological analysis of the provetriculus and gizzard of broilers fed wheat bran based diet supplemented with Natuzyme and Maxigrain. Bull Anim Hlth Prod Afr. 2017;65(4): 591-597.
  20. Alefzadeh T, Bouyeh M, Hoven R, Seidavi A, Laudadio V, Tufarelli V. Effect of dietary dried orange (Citrus sinensis) peel powder and exogenous multi-enzymes on growth and carcass traits and ileal microflora of broiler chickens. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 2016;48(6):1891-1897.
  21. Alshelmani MI, El-Safty SA, Kairalla MA, Humam AM. Enzymes in poultry feed. In: Badinszky, editor. Feed additives–recent trends in animal nutrition. 2024:85-98. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.112927
  22. Attia YA, Al-Khalaifah HS, Alqhtani AH, Abd El-Hamid HS, Alyileili SR, El-Hamid AE-HEA, Bovera F, El-Shafey AA. The impact of multi-enzyme fortification on growth performance, intestinal morphology, nutrient digestibility, and meat quality of broiler chickens fed a standard or low-density diet. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022;9:1012462. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1012462
  23. Bandforouzi KS, Rezaei M, KazemiFard M. Effects of different levels of tomato powder with and without addition of enzymes on performance, blood parameters and antioxidant status of Japanese quails. Res Anim Prod. 2019;10(23):11-21. doi:10.29252/rap.10.23.11
  24. Bedford MR, Apajalahti JH. The role of feed enzymes in maintaining poultry intestinal health. J Sci Food Agric. 2022;102(5):1759-1770. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11670
  25. Bedford MR, Svihus B, Cowieson AJ. Dietary fibre effects and the interplay with exogenous carbohydrases in poultry nutrition. Anim Nutr. 2023;16:231-240. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.09.007
  26. Cai Y, Zhang M, Hamada O, Song Z, Multi-enzyme supplementation enhances performance, intestinal and skeletal development in broilers fed low-nutrient diets. Poultry Science. 2026;105(2):106234. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.106234
  27. Chisoro P, Jaja IF, Assan N. Incorporation of local novel feed resources in livestock feed for sustainable food security and circular economy in Africa. Sustain. 2023;4:1251179. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2023.1251179
  28. Chrystal PV, Greenhalgh S, McInerney BV, McQuade LR, Akter Y, de Paula Dorigam JC, Selle PH,   Liu    Maize-based  diets  are  more  conducive  to  crude  protein  reductions  than  wheat-based  diets  for  broiler  chickens.  Animal  Feed  Science  and  Technology.  2021;275:114867. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114867
  29. Chudak RА. Quails productivity under the use of enzyme preparation. SWorldJournal. 2019;1:91-96. doi: 10.30888/2410-6615.2019-01-01-008
  30. de França TP, Ferreira RDS, Leo RAR, de Oliveira CH, Dias KMM, Gomes KM. Costa LS, Albino LFT. Effects  of  carbohydrase  and  phytase  enzymes  supplementation  within  low  energy  diets  on  performance  and  energy utilization of broiler chickens. Livestock Science. 2023;274:105271. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2023.105271
  31. Emadinia A, Toghyani M, Gheisari A, Tabeidian SA, Ale Saheb Fosoul SS, Mohammadrezaei M. Effect of wet feeding and enzyme supplementation on performance and immune responses of broiler chicks. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 2014;42(1):32-37. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2013.795901
  32. Gocheva Y, Engibarov S, Lazarkevich I, Eneva R. Phytases - Types, Sources, and factors affecting their activity. Acta Microbiol. Bulg. 2023;39(3):249-263. doi: 10.59393/amb23390305
  33. Grigore D-M, Mircea M-L, Pogurschi EN. Toward sustainable broiler production: evaluating microbial protein  as  supplementation for conventional feed proteins. Agriculture. 2025;15(14):1486. doi: 10.3390/agriculture15141486
  34. Hussein EOS, Suliman GM, Alowaimer AN, Ahmed SH, Abd El-Hack ME, Taha AE, Swelum AA. Growth, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of broilers fed a low-energy diet supplemented with a multienzyme preparation. Poultry Science. 2020;99(4):1988-1994. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.09.007
  35. Ismail FSA, El-Maaty HMAA, El-Sayed AAM. Performance of broiler chicks affected by dietary supplementation with commercial enzymes or probiotics. J Animal and Poultry Prod. 2011;2(2):23-32. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2011.83334
  36. Janmohammadi H, Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad B, Oliyai M, Alijani S, Gorlov IF, Slozhenkina MI, Mosolov AA, Suarez Ramirez L, Seidavi A, Laudadio V, Tufarelli V, Ragni M. Effect of dietary amaranth (amaranthus hybridus chlorostachys) supplemented with enzyme blend on egg quality, serum biochemistry and antioxidant status in laying hens. Antioxidants 2023;12(2):456. doi: 3390/antiox12020456
  37. Joudaki H, Aria N, Moravej R, Rezaei Yazdi M, Emami-Karvani Z, Hamblin MR. Microbial phytases: properties and applications in the food industry. Curr Microbiol. 2023;80(12):374. doi: 10.1007/s00284-023-03471-1
  38. Khalaji S, Zaghari M, Shivazad M. Estimation of standardised ileal threonine equivalency values of a multi-enzyme and its effects on broiler chick’s performance, Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2011;10(1):47-50. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2011.e10
  39. Kim E, Choct M, Fickler A, Pasquali GAM, Hall L, Crowley TM, Sharma NK. Strategic use of β-mannanase, and xylanase and β-glucanase preparation in maize-based diets to improve broiler performance. Animal Nutrition. 2025;23:493-501. doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2025.09.003
  40. Kırkpınar F. Introductory chapter: recent advances in animal feeding and nutrition. In: Kırkpınar F, editor. Animal feeds and additives. Intechopen. 2025:142. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1012034
  41. Ko H, Kang HK, Moturi J, Ingale SL, Kim J. Supplementation of enzyme cocktail in chickens diet is an effective approach to increase the utilization of nutrient in wheat-based diets. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021;63(1):69-76. doi: 10.5187/jast.2021.e1
  42. Li M, Wang M, Chen Y, Chen D, Yu B, He J, Yu J, Mao X, Huang Z, Luo Y, Luo J, Yan H, Zheng P. The protective role of a moderate protein diet in ETEC-infected piglets: Optimization of growth, immunity, and microbial balance. Animal Nutrition. 2026;25:62-72. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2025.10.010
  43. Madigan-Stretton J, Mikkelsen D, Soumeh EA. Multienzyme super-dosing in broiler chicken diets: the implications for gut morphology, microbial profile, nutrient digestibility, and bone mineralization. Animals. 2021;11(1):1. doi: 10.3390/ani11010001
  44. Malakzadegan A, Zaghari M, Khalaji S, Shivazad M. Crude protein equivalence value of a multi-enzyme product for 28- and 42-day-old broilers. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 2012;4(14):233-304. doi: 10.1590/S1516-635X2012000400010
  45. Moinuddin R, Barmase BS, Wade MR, Rekhate DH, Siddiqui MF. Utilization of toor dal (Cajanus cajan) waste with or without enzyme in broiler chicken diet. Pharma Innovation. 2020;9(5):129-131.
  46. Moss AF, Dao HT, Kim E, Morgan N, Dersjant-Li Y, Ghane A. Effects of phytase, xylanase, amylase and protease inclusion at full matrix specifications in diets for broiler chickens. Applied Sciences. 2026;16(6):2862. doi: 3390/app16062862
  47. Mundida G, Ndavambi C, Madzimure J. Impact of exogenous enzyme supplementation on broiler growth, carcass quality, and economic efficiency. East African Journal of Agriculture and Biotechnology. 2025;8(1):47-59. doi: 37284/eajab.8.1.2679
  48. Muremera CN, Ambula MK, King’ori AM. Performance of improved indigenous grower chicken in Kenya fed enzyme-treated Moringa (M. oleifera) leaf meal-based diets. Int J Vet Sci Anim Husbandry. 2022;7(3):48-52. doi:10.22271/veterinary.2022.v7.i3a.423
  49. Nguyen HT, Bedford MR, Wu SB, Morgan NK. Dietary soluble non-starch polysaccharide level influences performance, nutrient utilisation and disappearance of non-starch polysaccharides in broiler chickens. Animals (Basel). 2022;12(5):547. doi: 10.3390/ani12050547
  50. Nte IJ, Owen OJ, Owuno F. Anti-nutritional factors in animal feedstuffs: a review. International Journal of Research and Review. 2023;10(2);226-244. doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20230229
  51. Nwosu CI, Igugo RU. Serum biochemistry of broiler chickens fed varying levels of cassava peel meal supplemented with exogenous enzyme (natuzyme) as replacement for maize. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). 2020;9(7):437-441. doi: 10.21275/SR20622192621
  52. Oliaei AH, Palizdar MH, Tabrizi HRM. Inclusion a multi-enzyme (natuzyme plus®) in broiler chicken diets containing high canola meal. Global Veterinaria. 2016a;16(1):18-25. doi:10.5829/idosi.gv.2016.16.01.101110
  53. Oliaei AH, Palizdar MH, Tabrizi HRM. Influence of multi-enzymes (Natuzyme Plus®) on broiler chicken fed with high canola meal. Res Opin Anim Vet. Sci. 2016b;6(6):165-172. doi:10.20490/ROAVS/16-029
  54. Oloruntola OD, Ayodele SO, Agbede JO, Oloruntola DA. Effect of feeding broiler chickens with diets containing Alchornea cordifolia leaf meal and enzyme supplementation. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2016;252(65):489-498. doi:10.21071/AZ.V65I252.1916
  55. Qiu K, Chen J, Zhang G, Chang W, Zheng A, Cai H, Liu G, Chen Z. Effects of dietary crude protein and protease levels on performance, immunity capacity, and aa digestibility of broilers. Agriculture. 2023;13(3):703. doi:10.3390/agriculture13030703
  56. Rahmawati OM, Sugiharto S, Yudiarti T, Widiastuti E, Wahyuni HI, Sartono TA, Agusetyaningsih I, Ayasan T. Effect of unripe banana flour as a functional feed ingredient on growth performance, internal organ relative weight and carcass traits of broilers. Vet Med Sci. 2023;9(2):851-859. doi:10.1002/vms3.1070
  57. Rizwanuddin S, Kumar V, Naik B, Singh P, Mishra S, Rustagi S, Kumar V. Microbial phytase: Their sources, production, and role in the enhancement of nutritional aspects of food and feed additives. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 2023;12(1):100559. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100559
  58. Rostami A, Yaghobfar A, Ebrahimnezhad Y, Shahryar HA, Seyedabadi H. The effects of Hull less Barley with and without enzyme on Performance and Blood Parameters of Arian Broilers. Biological Forum – An International Journal. 2015;7(1):564-569.
  59. Salahi A, Abd El-Ghany W, Attia Y, Zabermawi N, Bovera F, Tufarelli V. Gut dysbiosis: Nutritional causes and risk prevention in poultry, with reference to other animals. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2025;55(2):32-63. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v55i2.01
  60. Seifi S. Commercial enzyme influence on broilers fed different level of wheat. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 2013;29(2):337-344. doi: 10.2298/BAH1302337S
  61. Selle PH, Macelline SP, Chrystal PV, Liu SY. The contribution of phytate-degrading enzymes to chicken-meat production. Animals (Basel). 2023;13(4):603. doi: 10.3390/ani13040603
  62. Sharifi SD, Golestani G, Yaghobfar A, Khadem A, Pashazanussi H. Effects of supplementing a multienzyme to broiler diets containing a high level of wheat or canola meal on intestinal morphology and performance of chicks. J Appl Poult Res. 2013;22(4):671-679. doi: 10.3382/japr.2011-00452
  63. Sherif KE. Performance of broiler chicks fed plant protein diets supplemented with commercial enzymes. J Agric Sci Mansoura Univ. 2009;34(4):2819-2834. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2009.116931
  64. Solanke CD, Wade MR, Barmase BS, Nemade NV. Effect of feeding safflower cake with or without enzymes on performance of broiler chickens. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;9(4):2982-2987. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.904.349
  65. Sugiharto S, Nuengjamnong C. An update review on the use of agro-industrial byproducts on carcass and meat quality of broiler chickens. Discov Food. 2025;5:203. doi: 10.1007/s44187-025-00509-0
  66. Sugiharto S, Rahmawati O, Yudiarti T, Widiastuti E, Wahyuni H, Sartono T, Agusetyaningsih I, Ayasan T. The use of unripe banana flour as a functional feed ingredient on blood profile, serum biochemical and  intestinal  indices  of   Open Agric J. 2023;17(1):e187433152301020. doi: 10.2174/18743315-v17-e230110-2022-44
  67. Suhermiyati S, Iriyanti N. The effect of natuzymein the diets containing non-starch polysaccharides on meat quality of native chicken. Animal Production. 2011;13(2):76-82.
  68. Sultan A, Alhassany A, Mahat H, Oramary SOM, Li X, Zhang D, Bryden WL. Nutrient digestibility of sorghum and wheat by broilers: effect of an enzyme cocktail. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Australian Poultry Science, Sydney, Australia, 19-22 February 2012. 2012:53.
  69. Sun X, Pei Z, Wang H, Zhao J, Chen W, Lu W. Bridging dietary polysaccharides and gut microbiome: How to achieve precision modulation for gut health promotion. Microbiological Research. 2025;292:128046. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2025.128046
  70. Sureshkumar S, Song J, Sampath V, Kim I. Exogenous enzymes as zootechnical additives in monogastric animal feed: a review. Agriculture. 2023;13(12):2195. doi:10.3390/agriculture13122195
  71. Swain BK, Naik PK, Singh NP. Performance, carcass characteristics and economics of production of broiler chickens fed diet supplemented with multienzyme. Indian Journal of Poultry Science. 2014;49(2):163-166.
  72. Taheri H, Shirzadegan K. Multiple-enzyme supplementation on digestive traits, carcass characteristics, blood lipid parameters and growth performance of broilers fed a wheat-based diet. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017;30(9):1285-1291. doi:10.5713/ajas.16.0415
  73. Tuleun CD, Okereke EA, Sunmola TA. Nutritional value of dietary raw bambara nut offal fortified with enzyme (Natuzyme®) on the performance of broiler chickens. Nig J Anim Prod. 2020;47(1):221-233. doi: 10.51791/njap.v47i1.233
  74. Walker H, Vartiainen S, Apajalahti J, Taylor-Pickard J, Nikodinoska I, Moran CA. The effect of including a mixed-enzyme product in broiler diets on performance, metabolizable energy, phosphorus and calcium retention. Animals (Basel). 2024;14(2):328. doi: 10.3390/ani14020328
  75. Widiarta PGD, Aldyanti A, Anindyasari D, Rizkuna A. The impact of feed price dynamics on broiler farm productivity and farmer welfare: a case study in Kutai kartanegara regency. Economic and Business Management International Journal. 2024;3(6):21-34. doi: 10.556442/eabmij.v6i3.872
  76. Zaghari M, Majdeddin M, Taherkhani R, Moravej H. Estimation of nutrient equivalency values of Natuzyme  and  its  effects  on  broiler  chick    J Appl Poult Res. 2008;17(4):446-453. doi: 10.3382/japr.2008-00007

Информация об авторе:

Артур Николаевич Ильяшенко, кандидат биологических наук, научный консультант по кормлению животных, Bioproton Europe Oy, 127322, г. Москва, ул. Милашенкова, 15, тел.: 8(909)912-77-31.

Статья поступила в редакцию 03.05.2026; одобрена после рецензирования 17.06.2026; принята к публикации 14.09.2026.

Загрузить