Anastasia P Ivanischeva, Elena A Sizova, Ksenia S Nechitailo

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2021. Vol. 104, no 4. Р. 22-31.

 doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-104-4-22

Digestibility of nutrients after using an organic mineral supplement in the diet of broiler chickens

 Anastasia P Ivanischeva1, Elena A Sizova2, Ksenia S Nechitailo3

1,2,3Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Orenburg, Russia

1n79228964398@yandex.ua, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8264-4616

2sizova.L78@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5125-5981

3k.nechit@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8755-414X

 Abstract. Several polysaccharides, including chitosan, are attractive for feed use due to their properties. Chitosan administered with food is capable of enzymatically degrading and assimilating in the form of low molecular weight compounds. Chitosan oligomers affect nonspecific resistance factors by stimulating the immune system. The aim of the research was to assess the effect of chitosan and ultrafine particles (UFPs)  of  Fe  and  Cu  on  growth,  digestibility of nutrients and chemical composition of body tissues of broiler chickens. The study was carried out on broiler chickens of the Arbor Acrеs cross (n = 60) in a vivarium. The use of chitosan (group I) and UFPs (group II) lead to a positive productive effect, however, joint feeding of chitosan and UFPs (group III) does not give a similar result. UFPs also affect the ability of chitosan to absorb fat in the small intestine, resulting in increased fat deposition. Thus, chitosan has the desired feed characteristics for successful use in broiler diets, contributing to the best digestibility and absorption of nutrients and, as a consequence, the productive effect.

Keywords: broiler chicken, feeding, chitosan, Fe UFPs, Cu UFPs, digestibility

Acknowledgments: the work was performed in accordance to the plan of research works for 2021-2023 FSBRI FRC BST RAS (No. 0761-2019-0005).

For citation: Ivanischeva AP, Sizova EA, Nechitailo KS. Digestibility of nutrients after using an organic mineral supplement in the diet of broiler chickens. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2021;104(4):22-31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-104-4-22

References

  1. Yausheva EV, Miroshnikov SA, Kosyan DB, Sizova EA. Nanoparticles 1in combination with amino acids change productive and immunological indicators of broiler chicken. Agricultural Biology. 2016;51(6):912-920. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2016.6.912eng
  2. Sizova EA, Miroshnikov SA, Lebedev SV, Kudasheva AV, Ryabov NI. To the development of innovative mineral additives based on alloy of Fe and Co antagonists as an example. Agricultural Biology. 2016;51(4):553-562. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2016.4.553eng
  3. Aspden TJ, Mason JDT, Jones NS et al. Chitosan as a nasal delivery system: the effect of chitosan solutions on in vitro and in vivo mucociliary transport rates in human turbinates and volunteers. J Pharm Sci. 1997;86(4):509-513. doi: 10.1021/js960182o
  4. Bergin IL, Witzmann FA. Nanoparticle toxicity by the gastrointestinal route: evidence and knowledge gaps. J Biomed Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2013;3(1-2):163-210. doi: 10.1504/IJBNN.2013.054515
  5. Choi KH, Namkung H, Paik IK. Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharides on the suppression of intestinal colonization of Salmonella typhimurium in broiler chickens. Korean J Anim Sci. 1994;36(3):271-284.
  6. Chou TC, Fu E, Shen EC. Chitosan inhibits prostaglandin E2 formation and cyclooxygenase-2 induction in lipopolysaccharide-treated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication. 2003;308(2):403-407. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01407-4
  7. Collier CT, Smiricky-Tjardes MR, Albin DM, Wubben JE, Gabert VM, Deplancke B, Bane D,  Anderson DB,  Gaskins HR. Molecular ecological analysis of porcine ileal microbiota responses to antimicrobial growth promoters. J Anim Sci. 2003;81(12):3035-3045. doi: 10.2527/2003.81123035x
  8. El-Kassasa S, Abdob SE, El-Naggarc K, Abdod W, Kirrellae AAK, Nasharf TO. Ameliorative effect of dietary supplementation of copper oxide nanoparticles on inflammatory and immune reponses in commercial broiler under normal and heat-stress housing conditions. Journal of Thermal Biology. 2018;78:235-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.10.009
  9. Fisinin VI, Miroshnikov SA, Sizova EA, Ushakov AS, Miroshnikova EP. Metal particles as trace-element sources: current state and future prospects. Worlds Poultry Science Journal. 2018;74(3):523-540. doi: 10.1017/S0043933918000491
  10. Huang RL, Yin YL, Wu GY, Zhang YG, Li TJ, Li LL, Li MX, Tang ZR, Zhang J, Wang B, He JH, Nie XZ. Effect of dietary oligochitosan supplementation on ileal digestibility of nutrients and performance in broilers. Poultry Sci. 2005;84(9):1383-1388. doi: 10.1093/ps/84.9.1383
  11. Khambualai O, Yamauchi K, Tangtaweewipat T, Cheva-Isarakul B. Effects of dietary chitosan diets on growth performance in broiler chickens. J Poultry Sci. 2008;45(3):206-209. doi:10.2141/jpsa.45.206
  12. Khambualai O, Yamauchi K, Tangtaweewipat T, Cheva-Isarakul B. Growth performance and intestinal histology in broiler chickens fed with dietary chitosan. British Poultry Sci. 2009;50(5):592-597. doi: 10.1080/00071660903247182
  13. Lan R, Chang Q, Lu Y. Effects of chitosan oligosaccharides on meat quality, muscle energy metabolism and anti-oxidant status in broilers that have experienced transport stress. Animal Production Science. 2021;61(15):1625-1632. doi: 10.1071/AN20249
  14. Le W, Ting-Ting L, Xi-Long W, Gui-Ping Y, Shi-Bin Y. Chitosan supplementation may improve the digestive physiology and health of captive Leiothrix lutea. Avian Biol. Res. 2015;8:221-226. doi: 10.3184/175815515X14424111706317
  15. LeMieux FM, Southern LL, Bidner TD. Effects of mannan oligosaccharides on growth performance of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;81(10):2482-2487. doi: 10.2527/2003.81102482x
  16. Li J, Cheng Y, Chen Y,  Qu H,  Zhao Y,  Wen C,  Zhou Y. Dietary chitooligosaccharide inclusion as an alternative to antibiotics improves intestinal morphology, barrier function, antioxidant capacity, and immunity of broilers at early age. Animals (Basel). 2019;9(8):493. doi: 10.3390/ani9080493
  17. Li XC, Ding XM, Peng X,  Chi XF,  Cui HM,  Zuo ZC ,  Fang J. Effect of chitosan oligosaccharides on antioxidant function, lymphocyte cycle and apoptosis in ileum mucosa of broiler. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2017;23(4):571-577. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2016.17329
  18. Li XJ, Piao XS, Kim SW,  Liu P,  Wang L,  Shen YB,  Jung SC,  Lee HS. Effects of chito-oligosaccharide supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, and serum composition in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2007;86(6):1107-1114. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.6.1107
  19. Liu W, Kong Y, Tu P,  Lu J,   Liu C, Liu W, Hanb  J,  Liu J.  Physical–chemical stability and in vitro digestibility of hybrid nanoparticles based on the layer-by-layer assembly of lactoferrin and BSA on liposomes. Food Funct. 2017;8(4):1688-1697. doi: 10.1039/c7fo00308k
  20. Logachev K, Karimov I, Duskaev G, Frolov A, Tulebaev S, Zav`yalov O. Study of intercellular interaction  of  ruminal  microorganisms  of beef cattle. Asian J of Animal Sci. 2015;9(5):248-253. doi: 10.3923/ajas.2015.248.253
  21. Mao HQ, Troung-le VL, Janes KA et al. Chitosan-DNA nanoparticles as gene carriers: synthesis, characterization and transfection efficiency. J Controlled Release. 2001;70(3):399-421. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(00)00361-8
  22. Miroshnikov S, Sizova E, Yausheva E, Uimin M, Konev A, Minin A, Yermakov A, Nikiyan H. Comparative toxicity of CuZn nanoparticles with different physical and chemical characteristics. Oriental Journal Of Chemistry. 2019;35(3):973-981. doi: 10.13005/ojc/350308
  23. Miroshnikov SA, Yausheva EV, Sizova EA, Miroshnikova EP, Levahin VI. Comparative assessment of effect of copper nano- and microparticles in сhicken. Oriental Journal Of Chemistry. 2015;31(4):2327-2336. doi: 10.13005/ojc/310461
  24. Mohapatra P, Swain RK, Mishra SK, Behera T, Swain P, Nc B, Sahoo GR, Sethy K, Bhol BP, Dhama K. Effects of dietary nano-selenium supplementation on the performance of layer grower birds. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 2014;9(10):641-652. doi: 10.3923/ajava.2014.641.652
  25. Seferian PG, Martinez ML. Immune stimulating activity of two new chitosan containing adjuvant formulations. Vaccine. 2000;19(6):661-668. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00248-6
  26. Shi BL, Li DF, Piao XS, Yan SM. Effects of chitosan on growth performance and energy and protein utilisation in broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 2005;46(4):516-519. doi: 10.1080/00071660500190785
  27. Swiatkiewicz S, Arczewska-Wlosek A, Jozefiak D. Feed enzymes, probiotic, or chitosan can improve the nutritional efficacy of broiler chicken diets containing a high level of distillers dried grains with solubles. Livest Sci. 2014;163:110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.03.001
  28. Wang C, Wang MQ, Ye SS, Tao WJ, Du YJ. Effects of copper-loaded chitosan nanoparticles on growth and immunity in broilers. Poultry Science. 2011;90(10):2223-2228. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01511
  29. Wang XW, Du YG, Bai XF, Li SG. The effect of oligochitosan on broiler gut flora, microvilli density, immune function and growth performance. Acta Zoonutr Sin. 2003;15:32-45. doi: 10.5897/AJB11.1648
  30. Yausheva E, Miroshnikov S, Sizova E. Intestinal microbiome of broiler chickens after use of nanoparticles and metal salts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(18):18109-18120. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1991-5
  31. Zhou T, Chen Y, Yoo J,  Huang Y,  Lee J,  Jang H,  Shin S,  Kim H,  Cho J,  Kim I. Effects of chitooligosaccharide supplementation on performance, blood characteristics, relative organ weight, and meat quality in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2009;88(3):593-600. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00285
  32. Zou P, Yang X, Wang J,  Li YF,  Yu HL,  Zhang YX,  Liu GY. Advances in characterisation and biological activities of chitosan and chitosan oligosaccharides. Food Chem. 2016;190:1174-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.06.076

Information about the authors:

Anastasia P Ivanischeva, postgraduate student of 2 years of study, technician-specialist of the Center for Collective Use "Testing Center", Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8-987-843-58-22.

Elena A Sizova, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Head of the Center for Nanotechnology in Agriculture, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8-912-344-99-07.

Ksenia S Nechitailo, Researcher of the Center for Nanotechnology in Agriculture, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000.

The article was submitted 09.11.2021; approved after reviewing 09.11.2021; accepted for publication 13.12.2021.

Download