Kaldygulov SR, Kadysheva MD, Tyulebaev SD, Kosilov VI, Amirshoev FS

DOI: 10.33284/2658-3135-102-4-123

UDC 636.082.11:636.22/.28.082.11


Research was carried out according the plan of research scientific works on 2019-2021 yy. FSBSI FRC BST RAS (No 0761-2019-0012)

Comparative characteristics of heifers population of Bredy beef type of the Simmental breed

according to some biological indicators

Samat R Kaldygulov1, Marvat D Kadysheva1, Sayasat D Tyulebaev1, Vladimir I Kosilov2,

Fayzullo S Amirshoev3

1 Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Orenburg, Russia)

2Orenburg State Agrarian University (Orenburg, Russia)

3Institute of Animal Breeding, Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Republic of Tajikistan, Dushanbe)

Summary. A comparative study of biological characteristics of young cattle of Bredy beef type of two populations located in Russia and Kazakhstan was carried out to determine the state of allelic forms of some marker genes and elemental status according coat depending on the breeding site. During genotyping, a real-time PCR method using oligonucleotide primers (GenBank) was used, for each primer individually in the corresponding sequences. The elemental composition was determined in laboratory conditions on animal hair samples using a quadrupole mass spectrometer using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (IC-ICP). Studies have revealed the frequencies of genotypes and alleles for marker genes CAPN1, TG5, BGL, which are related to meat quality indicators, while a certain shift in genotypes of the compared populations was found for the CAPN1 gene (ᵪ2 = 8.52) and the TG5 gene (ᵪ2 = 4.73). A difference in the elemental composition of wool of animals from different populations was found, due to a depressive effect on the environment, as well as the consequences of toxic activities in one of the zones under consideration. It is noted that indicators according to the content of Co, Cr, Ni, Pb, V exceed the reference intervals for the zone of the South Urals developed by our scientists, from 1.6 times for Co to 5.7 times for V. According to these standards, the content of chemical elements in the coat of animals, Sovkhoz Bredinsky LLC corresponded to the identified centiles (25-75%).

Key words: cattle, Simmental breed, Bredy beef type, young animals, gene, genotype, allele, frequency of genotypes and alleles, wool, chemical element.


  1. Mazurovsky LZ, Kadisova GN, Tyulebaev SD. Beef qualities of Simmental. Zootekhniya. 1995;3:9-11.
  2. Kayumov FG, Kanatpaev SM, Tyulebaev SD, Kadysheva MD. The first breeding plant for breeding "Bredy beef" type of Simmental. Herald of Beef Cattle Breeding. 2008;61(I): 117-119.
  3. Revich BA.Biomonitoring of toxic substances in the human body. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2004;6:26-30.
  4. Skalny AV, Miroshnikov SA, Notova SV, Bolodurina IP, Miroshnikov SV, Alidzhanova IE.Regional features of the elemental homeostasis as an indicator of ecological and physiological adaptation. Human Ecology. 2014;9:14-17.
  5. Miroshnikov SA, Zavyalov OA, Frolov AN, Kurilkina MYa, Tyapugin EA, Tagirov KhKh.Reference ranges of concentrations of chemical elements in the wool of dairy cows. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2019;102(3):33-45. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-102-3-33
  6. Tyulebaev S, Kadysheva M. Development of interbreed beef type of Simmental. Dairy and Beef Cattle Breeding. 2005;6:21-23.
  7. Beuzen ND, Stear MJ, Chang KC. Molecular markers and their use in animal breeding. Vet J. 2000;160(1):42-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2000.0468
  8. Donat K, Siebert W, Menzer E, Söllner-Donat S. Long-term trends in the metabolic profile test results in German Holstein dairy herds in Thuringia, Germany. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2016;44(2):73-82. doi: 10.15653/TPG-150948
  9. Georges М, Charlier С, Hayes В. Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement. Nature ReviewsGenetics. 2019;20(3):135-156. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0082-2
  10. Ghorbani A, Mohit A, Darmani Kuhi H. Effects of dietary mineral intake on hair and serum mineral contents of horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 2015;35(4):295-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2015.01.018
  11. Goldhaber SB. Trace element risk assessment: essentiality vs. toxicity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003. 38(2):232-242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00020-X
  12. Kiplagat SK, Limo MK, Kosgey IS. Genetic improvement of livestock for milk production. Milk Production – Advanced Genetic Traits, Cellular Mechanism, Animal Management and Health. Chaiyabutr N, editor. Winchester: Intech Open; 2012:77-96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/50761
  13. Kolosova МА, Getmantseva LV, Bakoev SY, Kolosov AY, Bakoev NF, et. al. Associations of mtDNA haplotypes with productive traits in pigs. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. 2019;30(4):807-813. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-019-00853-1
  14. Miroshnikov S, Kharlamov A, Zavyalov O, Frolov A, Bolodurina I, Arapova O. Duskaev G. Method of sampling beef cattle hair for assessment of elemental profile. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2015;14(9):632-636. doi: https:/dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2015.632.636
  15. Miroshnikov S, Zavyalov O, Frolov A, Sleptsov I, Sirazetdinov F, Poberukhin M. The content of toxic elements in hair of dairy cows as an indicator of productivity and elemental status of animals. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019;26(18):18554-18564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05163-5
  16. Miroshnikov SA, Zavyalov OA, Frolov AN, Bolodurina IP, Kalashnikov VV, Grabeklis AR, Tinkov AA, Skalny AV. The reference intervals of hair trace element content in hereford cows and heifers (Bos taurus). Biol Trace Elem Res. 2017;180(1):56-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-017-0991-5
  17. Skalny AV, Skalnaya MG, Tinkov AA, Serebryansky EP, Demidov VA, et al. Hair concentration of essential trace elements in adult non-exposed Russian population. Environ Monit Assess. 2015;187(11):677. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4903-x
  18. Yadav BR, Mitra A. One day symposium on emerging DNA technologies for the next millennium. CCMB/CDFD, Hyderabad, 23 February, Abstract. 1999:9.

Kaldygulov Samat Reyovich, external doctorate student of Beef Cattle Breeding Department, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St.,tel .: 8(3532)30-81-74, e- mail: vniims.or@mail.ru

Kadysheva Marvat Dusangalievna, Cand. Sci. (Agr.), Senior Researcher, Beef Cattle Breeding Department, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St.,tel .: 8(3532)30-81-74, e-mail: vniims.or@mail.ru

Tyulebaev Sayasat Dzhakslykovich, Dr. Sci. (Agr.), Professor, Head of the Beef Cattle Breeding Department, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St.,tel.: 8(3532)30-81-74, e-mail: vniims.or@mail.ru

Kosilov Vladimir Ivanovich, Dr. Sci. (Agr.), Professor of Department of Production Technology and Processing of Livestock Products, Orenburg State Agrarian University, 460014, Orenburg, Russia, 18 Chelyuskintsev, St.

Amirshoev Fayzullo Safarovich, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor, Director of Institute of Institute of Animal Breeding, Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 734067, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan, 17 Giprozem St., tel .: 810992372310607

Received: 25 November 2019; Accepted: 16 December 2019;Published: 31 December 2019