Kseniya S Nechitailo, Kristina V Ryazantseva, Elena A Sizova, Vladimir L Korolyov

DOI: 10.33284/2658-3135-104-1-94

UDC 636.5:547.992

Acknowledgements:

Research was carried out according the plan of research scientific works on 2021-2023 yy. FSBSI FRC BST RAS (No 0761-2019-0005)

Biological active additives for poultry farming based on humic complexes (review)

Kseniya S Nechitailo, Kristina V Ryazantseva, Elena A Sizova, Vladimir L Korolyov

Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of  the Russian Academy of Sciences (Orenburg, Russia)

Summary The search for alternative natural agents with antibacterial activity, but which are safer, is an urgent global task. One of these substances are humic substances. They have a positive effect on the digestive tract, immune system, antioxidant status and mineral metabolism in poultry. In particular, a number of researchers note an increase in the feed conversion rate in experimental poultry; it is reflected in the productivity of broiler chickens and the final yield. Taking into account the analysis of literature, we note that the use of humic substances in poultry farming is a promising and effective strategy.

Key words: humic acids, fulvic acids, humic substances, humins, productivity, broiler chickens.

References

  1. Bakharev AA, Alexandrova SS. Influence of potassium humate on meat productivity of broiler chickens. The Epoch of Science. 2020;24:24-29.
  2. Bezuglova OS, Zinchenko VE. Аpplication of humic substances in animal husbandry (review). Achievements of Science and Technology of AICis. 2016;30(2):89-93.
  3. Simakova IV, Vasiliev AA, Korsakov KV, Lifanova SP, Gulyaeva LY. The Influence of humic acids on the formation of safety and commodity qualities of broiler chicken meat. Technologies of food and processing industries of AIC – healthy food. 2018;1(21):15-22.
  4. Kapitonova EA, Pchelnikova YM, Chirvinskiy AY. Efficiency of humic acids for poultry breeding. Zootechnical Science of Belarus. 2018:53(2):151-158.
  5. Komirnyaya AN, Komlatskii VI. Prospects for the use of humic substances in poultry farming. (Conference proceedings) Scientific support of the agro-industrial complex: collection of articles. Art. based on the materials of the 75th scientific-practical. conf. students based on the results of research work for 2019 (Krasnodar, March 02-16, 2020). Krasnodar: KGAU named after Trubilin IT, 2020:272-274.
  6. Korsakov KV. Efficiency of using a feed additive based on humic acids in growing broiler chickens (Conference proceedings) Agro-industrial complex: problems and development prospects: theses of reports. All-Russian scientific-practical. conf. (Blagoveshchensk, 15 april 2020). Blagoveshchensk: FSAU; 2020:124.
  7. Lebedev SV, Osipova EA. Сhanging the quantity of heavy metals in wheat under different forms of iron with humic acid. Fundamental Research. 2014;11(11);2438-2442.
  8. Lebedev SV, Osipova EA, Salnikova EV. Сhanging the quantity of elements in wheat triticum vulgare vill. by different forms of iron with humic acids. Vestnik Orenburg State University. 2015;6(181):73-77.
  9. Loginov GP, Simakova SA. Efficiency of feed additive "GumoSpir" growing in the agricultural poultry. Scientific Notes Kazan Bauman State Academy of Veterinary Medicine. 2011;205:124-130.
  10. Lyubimova NA, Rabinovich GYu. Humic substances as components of feed additives (review). Achievements of Science and Technology of AICis. 2020;34(9):77-84. doi: 10.24411/0235-2451-2020-10914
  11. Osipova EA et al. Assessment of changes in the content of toxic elements (Pb, As, Hg, Cd) in aboveground parts of wheat Triticum vulgare vill under the influence of insertion into the soil an aqueous suspension of humic acids with different forms of iron. RUDN Journal of Ecology and Life Safety. 2018;26(2):195-206. doi: 10.22363/2313-2310-2018-26-2-195-206
  12. Sboev AA, Sitnikov VA. The effect of humic acid concentration on the growth and development of broilers. Perm Agrarian Journal. 2020;2(30):114-121. doi: 10.24411/2307-2873-2020-10027
  13. Seryakov IS, Lisitskaya NN, Bylitsky NM. The effectiveness of using "Gumovet" in the diets of broiler chickens. Actual problems of intensive development of animal husbandry: collection of articles. scientific. Works Gorki: BGSKhA; 2012;15(1):219-228.
  14. Singariyeva NSh, Topuria LYu, Topuria GM. Growth and development of ducklings fed preparation of gumic nature. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2019;2(76):245-247.
  15. Gribanova EA, Karimova RG, Garipov TV, Pavlova ON. Сontents of microelements in the muscle and vitamins in the liver of broiler chickens at a load of potassium humate. Scientific Notes Kazan Bauman State Academy of Veterinary Medicine. 2013;215:81-85.
  16. Syardina IP. Morphological composition of the blood of broiler chickens when using a humic preparation. Agricultural Sciences and Agro-Industrial Complex at the Turn of the Century. 2014;5:235-238.
  17. Abdel-Mageed MAA. Effect of dietary humic substances supplementation on performance and immunity of Japanese quail. Egypt Poult Sci. 2012;32(3): 645-660.
  18. Aeschbacher M et al. Antioxidant properties of humic substances. Environmental Science & Technology. 2012;46(9):4916-4925. doi: 10.1021/es300039h
  19. Arafat RY, Khan SH et al. Evaluation of humic acid as an aflatoxin binder in broiler chickens. Annals of Animal Science. 2017;17(1):241-255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2016-0050
  20. Arif M et al. Impacts of dietary humic acid supplementation on growth performance, some blood metabolites and carcass traits of broiler chicks. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2016;86(9):1073-1078.
  21. Arif M, Rehman A, Abd El-Hack ME et al. Growth, carcass traits, cecal microbial counts, and blood chemistry of meat-type quail fed diets supplemented with humic acid and black cumin seeds. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018;31(12):1930-1938. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0148
  22. Aristimunha PC et al. Effect of dietary organic acids and humic substance supplementation on performance, immune response and gut morphology of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2020;29(1):85-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfz031
  23. Awwad M, Atta AM, Elmenawey M et al. Effect of acidifiers on gastrointestinal tract integrity, zootechnical performance and colonization ofClostridium perfringensand aerobic bacteria in broiler chickens. J Am Sci. 2011;7(4):618-628.
  24. Cha JY, Kang SH, Ali I, Lee SC, Ji MG, Jeong SY, Shin GI, Kim MG, Jeon JR, Kim WY. Humic acid enhances heat stress tolerance via transcriptional activation of Heat-Shock Proteins in Arabidopsis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71701-8
  25. Chang QF, Bai HX, Shi BM, Shan AS, Wei CY, Yu CQ, Tong BS. Effects of dietary FA on the growth performance, serum biochemical indices, routine blood parameter and immunity of growing swine. Chin J Anim Nutr. 2013;25:1836-1842.
  26. Chianese S, Fenti A, Iovino P, Musmarra D, Salvestrini S. Sorption of organic pollutants by humic acids: a review. Molecules. 2020;25(4):918. doi: 10.3390/molecules25040918
  27. Dai C, Xiao X, Yuan Y, Sharma G, Tang S. A comprehensive toxicological assessment of fulvic acid. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:8899244. doi: 10.1155/2020/8899244
  28. Delannoy M, Schwarz J, Fournier A, Rychen G, Feidt C. Effects of standard humic materials on relative bioavailability    of NDL-PCBs    in    juvenile  swine. PLoS  One. 2014;9(12):e115759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115759
  29. Disetlhe ARP et al. Humic acid and enzymes in canola-based broiler diets: Effects on bone development, intestinal histomorphology and immune development. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2017;47(6):914-922. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v47i6.19
  30. Disetlhe ARP, Marume U, Mlambo V, Hugo A. Effects of dietary humic acid and enzymes on meat quality and fatty acid profiles of broiler chickens fed canola-based diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019;32(5):711-720. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0408
  31. Domínguez-Negrete A, Gómez-Rosales S, Angeles ML, López-Hernández LH, Reis-de Souza TC, López-García Y, Zavala-Franco A, Téllez-Isaias G. Effect of the addition of humic substances as growth promoter in broiler chickens under two feeding regimens. Animals. 2019;9(12):1101. doi: 10.3390/ani9121101
  32. Edmonds MS, Johal S, Moreland S. Effect of supplemental humic and butyric acid on performance and mortality in broilers raised under various environmental conditions. Journal Of Applied Poultry Research. 2014;23(2):260-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00901
  33. Gao Y, He J, He Z, Li Z, Zhao B, Mu Y, Chu Z. Effects of fulvic acid on growth performance and intestinal health of juvenile loach Paramisgurnus dabryanus (Sauvage). Fish Shellfish Immunology. 2017;62:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.01.008
  34. Ghazalah AA, Atta AM, Elkloub K, Mustafa MEl, Shata RFH. Effect of dietary supplementation of organic acids on performance, nutriens digestibility and health of broiler chicks. Int J Poult Sci. 2011;10(3):176-184. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2011.176.184
  35. Gomez-Rosales S, de L Angeles M. Addition of a worm leachate as source of humic substances in the   drinking  water  of  broiler  chickens. Asian-Australas  J  Anim  Sci. 2015;28(2):215-222. doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0321
  36. Ilan Y. Leaky gut and the liver: A role for bacterial translocation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012;18(21):2609-2618. doi: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i21.2609
  37. Islam MZ, Tutar A et al. Humic substances – versatile natural products: Properties & applications. In: Filcheva E et al., editors. 19th International Conference of Humic Substances and their Contribution to the Climate Change Mitigation; 2018 September 16-21; Bulgaria, Albena Resort, 2019;1(5). p. 30-38.
  38. Jaďuttová I, Marcinčáková D, Bartkovský M, Semjon B, Harčarová M, Nagyová A, Váczi P, Marcinčák S. The effect of  dietary  humic  substances  on fattening performance, carcass yield, biochemical blood parameters and bone mineral profile of broiler chickens. Acta Vet Brno. 2019;88:307-313. doi: https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201988030307
  39. Johnsson M, Johnsson KB, Andersson L, Jensen P, Wright D. Genetic regulation of bone metabolism in the chicken: similarities and differences to mammalian systems. PLOS Genetics. 2015;11(5):e1005250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005250
  40. Jung H, Kwon S, Kim JH, Jeon JR. Which traits of humic substances are investigated to improve their agronomical value? Molecules. 2021;26(3):760. doi:10.3390/molecules26030760
  41. Kaevska M, Lorencova A, Videnska P, Sedlar K, Provaznik I, Trckova M. Effect of sodium humate and zinc oxide used in prophylaxis of post-weaning diarrhoea on faecal microbiota composition in weaned piglets. Vet Med.2016;61:328-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.17221/54/2016-VETMED
  42. Kamel MM, Elhady M, El Iraqi KG, Wahba FA. Biologyical immune stimulants effects on immune response, behavioural and productive performance of broilers. Egypt. Poult. Sci. J.2015;35:691-702.
  43. Maguey-Gonzalez JA, Michel MA, Baxter MFA, Tellez G Jr, Moore PA Jr, Solis-Cruz B, Hernández-Patlan D, Merino-Guzman R, Hernandez-Velasco X, Latorre JD, Hargis BM, Gomez-Rosales S, Tellez-Isaias G. Effect of humic acids on intestinal viscosity, leaky gut and ammonia excretion in a 24 hr feed restriction model to induce intestinal permeability in broiler chickens. Anim Sci J. 2018;89(7):1002-1010. doi:10.1111/asj.13011
  44. Mao Y. Modulation of the growth performance, meat composition, oxidative status, and immunity of broilers by dietary fulvic acids. Poult Sci. 2019;98(10):4509-4513. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez281
  45. Mézes M, Erdélyi M, Balogh K. Deposition of organic trace metal complexes as feed additives in farm animals. Eur Chem Bull.2012;1(10):410-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.17628/ecb.2012.1.410-413
  46. Mohammadsadeghi F, Afsharmanesh M, Ebrahimnejad H. The substitution of humic material complex with mineral premix in diet and interaction of that with probiotic on performance, intestinal morphology and microflora of chickens. Livestock Science. 2019;228:1-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.07.010
  47. Mudroňová D, Karaffová V, Pešulová T, Koščová J, Cingeľová Maruščáková I, Bartkovský M, Marcinčáková D, Z. Ševčíková Z, Marcinčák S. The effect of humic substances on gut microbiota and immune response of broilers. Food and Agricultural Immunology. 2020;31(1):137-149.  doi: 10.1080/09540105.2019.1707780
  48. Murbach TS, Glávits R, Endres JR, Clewell AE, Hirka G, Vértesi A, Béres E, Pasics Szakonyiné I. A toxicological evaluation of a fulvic and humic acids preparation. Toxicol Rep. 2020;7:1242-1254. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.08.030
  49. Ozturk E, Coskun I, Ocak N, Erener G, Dervisoglu M, Turhan S. Performance, meat quality, meat mineral contents and caecal microbial population responses to humic substances administered in drinking water in broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2014;55(5):668-674. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2014.960807
  50. Piccolo A. The Nature of Soil Organic Matter and Innovative Soil Managements to Fight Global Changes and Maintain Agricultural Productivity. In: Piccolo A, editors. Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2012:1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23385-2_1
  51. Roth N, Käsbohrer A, Mayrhofer S, Zitz U, Hofacre C, Domig KJ. The application of antibiotics in broiler production and the resulting antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli: A global overview. Poult Sci. 2019;98(4):1791-1804. doi:10.3382/ps/pey539
  52. Saki AA, Harcini RN, Rahmetnejad E, Salary J. Herbal additives and organic acids as antibiotic alternatives in broiler chickens diet for organic production. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11(8):2139-2145.
  53. Salzman NH. Microbiota-immune system interaction: An uneasy alliance. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2011;14:99-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2010.09.018
  54. Semjon B, Marcinčáková D, Koréneková B, Bartkovský M, Nagy J, Turek P, Marcinčák S. Multiple factorial analysis of physicochemical and organoleptic properties of breast and thigh meat of broilers fed a  diet  supplemented  with  humic  substances. Poultry  Science. 2020;99(3):1750-1760. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.012
  55. Shoba V., Chudnenko K. Ion exchange properties of humus acids. Eurasian Soil Science. 2014;47. 761-771. doi:10.1134/S1064229314080110.
  56. Taklimi SM, Ghahri H, Isakan MA. Influence of different levels of humic acid and esterified glucomannan on growth performance and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Agric Sci. 2012;3(5):663-668. doi: 10.4236/as.2012.35080
  57. Vaskova J, Patlevič P, Žatko D, Marcinčák S, Vaško L, Krempaská K, Nagy J. Effects of humic acids on poultry under stress conditions. Slov Vet Res. 2018;55(4):245-253. doi: https://doi.org/10.26873/SVR-469-2018
  58. Vaskova J, Velika B, Pilatova M, Kron I, & Vasko L. Effects of humic acids in vitro. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Animal. 2011;47:376-382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-011-9405-8
  59. Wood CM, Al-Reasi H, & Smith DS. The two faces of DOC. Aquatic Toxicology.2011;105(3-4):3-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.03.007
  60. Zhang AR et al. Dietary supplementation with sodium humate improves egg quality and immune function of laying hens. Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition. 2020;8(2):93-99. doi: https://doi.org/10.3920/JAAN2020.0009

Nechitailo Kseniya Sergeevna, 3nd year postgraduate student, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St, e-mail: k.nechit@mail.ru

Ryazantseva Kristina Vladimirovna, 3nd year postgraduate student, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St, e-mail: reger94@bk.ru

Sizova Elena Anatolyevna, Dr. Sci (Biol.), Head of Centre “Nanotechnologies in Agriculture”, Federal Research Centre for Biological Systems and Agricultural Technologies of Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., tel.: 8-912-344-99-07, e-mail: Sizova.L78@yandex.ru

Korolyov Vladimir Leontyevich, Dr. Sci (Agr.), Leading Researcher Department of Agricultural Animals Nutrition and Fodder Technology named after Leushin SG, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., tel.: 8(3532)30-81-79

Received: 19 February 2021; Accepted: 15 March 2021; Published: 31 March 2021

Download