Victoria V Grechkina, Sergey А Medvedev, Svyatoslav V Lebedev, Elena V Sheyda, Irina V Markova

DOI: 10.33284/2658-3135-104-3-104

UDC 636.085.57:636.085.25

Acknowledgements:

The research was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Scientific Foundation "Development of systemic diagnostics and correction of elementoses depending on the genetic resources of agricultural animals" (No. 21-16-00009)

The effect of chemical treatment on increasing the nutritional value of cocoa husks

in "in vitro" model

Victoria V Grechkina1,2, Sergey А Medvedev1, Svyatoslav V Lebedev1, Elena V Sheyda1,3, Irina V Markova1

1Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Orenburg, Russia)

2Orenburg State Agrarian University (Orenburg, Russia)

3Orenburg State University (Orenburg, Russia)

Abstract. Cocoa husk is a rich source of dietary fiber and protein, as well as valuable biologically active compounds (theobromine, caffeine, flavonoids, etc.), and due to its composition can be used as an energy source in feeding farm animals and poultry. In order to increase the nutritional value of cocoa husk, various methods of chemical processing were tested in the experiment. Treatment with alkali (sodium hydroxide, NaOH) and extrusion of cocoa husks contributed to an increase in the digestibility of raw fat from 13.98% in the husk to 43.55% (P≤0,05), the degree of availability of minerals contained in the product increased, which was expressed in an increase in the digestibility of the ash residue from 14.42 to 21.87% (P≤0,05). Treatment with alkali of various concentrations of cocoa shell led to partial destruction of the hard surfaces of the husk, increased protein availability and its digestibility from 16.62% in the initial sample to 57.92% in the subjects, while the effect of the introduced alkali in the amount of 45 g/kg and 60 g/kg was almost identical. Due to its nutritional value and biologically active compounds, cocoa shell can become a source of cheap energy for raising farm animals and poultry.

Keywords: feed, metabolizable energy, proteins, digestibility, waste.

References

  1. Antipova LV, Morkovkina IA, Popov VI. Use of dairy and vegetative raw materials as bases for functional drinks. News of Higher Educational Institutions. Food Technology. 2012;2-3(326-327):81-84.
  2. GOST 13496.4-93 Feed, compound feed, compound feed raw materials. Methods for the determination of nitrogen and crude protein content. Intro. 01.01.1995. Moscow: Standardinform; 1993:17 р.
  3. GOST 24230-80. Vegetable feeds. Method for determination of digestibility in vitro. Intro. 01.07.1981. Moscow: Standardinform; 2003:4 р.
  4. GOST 26226-95. Feed, compound feed, compound feed raw materials. Methods for the determination of raw ash. Intro. 01.01.1977. Moscow: PPC Publishing house of standards; 1996:8 p.
  5. GOST 31675-2012. Feeds. Methods for determination of crude fibre content with intermediate filtration. Intro. 01.07.2013. Moscow: Standardinform; 2014:18 р.
  6. GOST 13496.15-97. Feed, compound feed, compound feed raw materials. Methods for determination of crude fat content (with Amendment No. 1). Intro. 01.01.1999. Moscow: Standardinform; 1997:19 р.
  7. Esaulenko IE, Popov VI, Petrovа TN. Hygienic assessment of various forms of organizing school meals. (Conference proceedings) Food security: scientific, personnel and information support: materials of the International conference. scientific and technical conf. (Voronezh, November 13-14, 2014). Voronezh: VGUIT; 2014;2:77-84.
  8. Miroshnikov SA, Notova SV, Miroshnikov SV, Bolodurina IP, Skalniy AV. Regional features of elemental homeostasis and problem of ecolo physiological adaptation: methodological aspect. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2013;6(58):52-55.
  9. Skokleenko MV, Kulichenko AI, Mamchenko TV. The use of secondary products of processing of cocoa beans to improve the competitiveness of confectionery products. Young Scientist. 2014;6(65):366-368.
  10. Fitsev AI, Grigoriev NG, Gaganov AP. Modern assessment of the energy and protein nutritional value of plant feed. Feed Production. 2003;12:29-32.
  11. Chugunova OV, Kokoreva LA, Zavorokhina NV. Prospects of using cocoa-shell in the production of chocolate syrup. Beer and Drinks. 2014; 6:62-64.
  12. Okolelova TM, Laptev GYu, Bolshakov VN, Selivanov DG, Mansurov RSh. The effectiveness of provitol in mixed feed for chickens. Poultry. 2014;1:12-14.
  13. Awad WA, Ghareeb K, Abdel-Raheem S, Böhm J. Effect of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2009;88(1):49-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244
  14. Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M. Biological effects of essential oils – A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008;46(2):446-475. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106
  15. Caes BR, Teixeira RE, Knapp KG, Raines RT. Biomass to Furanics:  Renewable Routes  to  Chemicals  and Fuels. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2015;3(11):2591-2605. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00473
  16. Cheng G, Hao H, Xie S, Wang X, Dai M, Huang L, Yuan Z. Antibiotic alternatives: the substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry? Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5:217. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00217
  17. Cowan MM. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 1999;12(4):564-582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.12.4.564
  18. Delaquis PJ, Stanich K, Girard B, Mazza G. Antimicrobial activity of individual and mixed fractions of dill, cilantro, coriander and eucalyptus essential oils. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2002;74(1-2):101-109. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00734-6
  19. Gheisar MM, Kim IH. Phytobiotics in poultry and swine nutrition – a review. Ital J Anim. Sci. 2018;17(1):92-99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1350120
  20. Grechkina VV, Lebedev SV, Miroshnikov IS, Ryazanov VA, Sheida EV, Korolev V L. Justification of rational and safe biotechnological methods of using fat additives from vegetable raw materials. IOP: Earth and Environmental Science: International Conference on World Technological Trends in Agribusiness; 2020 4-5 July, Omsk City, Western Siberia, Russian Federation. Bristol, England: IOP Publishing; 2021;624:012160. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/624/1/012160
  21. Huang MJ, Huang HQ, Salam N, Xiao M, Duan YQ, Kim CJ, Li QQ, Chen W, Li WJ. Nocardioides intraradicalis sp. nov., isolated from the roots of psammosilene tunicoides W. C. Wu et C. Y. Wu. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2016;66(10):3841-3847. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001274
  22. Kang JX, Wan JB, He C. Concise review: regulation of stem cell proliferation and differentiation by essential fatty acids and their metabolites. Stem Cells. 2014;32(5):1092-1098. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1620
  23. Kimball SR, Jefferson LS. Signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms through which branched-chain amino acids mediate translational control of protein synthesis. J. Nutr. 2006;136(1):227S-231S. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.1.227S
  24. Liu Z, Long W, Frybarg DA, Barret EJ. The regulation of body and skeletal muscle protein metabolism by hormones and amino acids. J. Nutr. 2006;136(1):212S-217S. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.1.212S
  25. Malesci A, Gaia E, Fioretta A et al. No effect of long-term treatment with pancreatic extract on recurrent abdominal pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1995;30(4):392-398. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/00365529509093296
  26. Rocha MVP, Rodrigues THS, de Albuquerque TL, Gonçalves LRB, de Macedo GR. Evaluation of dilute acid pretreatment on cashew apple bagasse for ethanol and xylitol production. Chem Eng J. 2014;243:234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.099
  27. Rolfe RD. The role of probiotic cultures in the control of gastrointestinal health. The Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130(2):396S-402S. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.2.396s
  28. Tang Q. Lipid metabolism and diseases. Sci. Bull. 2016;61(19):1471-1472. doi 10.1007/s11434-016-1174-z
  29. Upadhaya SD, Kim SJ, Kim IH. Effects of gel-based phytogenic feed supplement on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and intestinal morphology in weanling pigs. J Appl Anim Res. 2016;44(1):384-389. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2015.1091334
  30. Wang Y, Gu Q. Effect of probiotic on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of Arbor Acres broilers. Research in Veterinary Science. 2010;89(2):163-167. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.03.009
  31. Wegener HC. Antibiotics in animal feed and their role in resistance development. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003;6(5):439-445 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2003.09.009
  32. Yadav AS et al. Exploring alternatives to antibiotics as health promoting agents in poultry - a review. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences. 2016;4(3S):368-383. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(3S).368.383
  33. Zdunczyk Z, Jankowski J, Kaczmareks S, Juskiewicz J. Determinants and effects of postileal fermentation in broilers and turkeys. Part 1: gut microbiota composition and its modulation by feed additives. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2015;71(1):37-48. doi: 10.1017/S0043933915000045
  34. Zhou J, Liu H, Zhou S et al. Adaptor protein APPL1 interacts with EGFR to orchestrate EGF-stimulated signaling. Sci. Bull. 2016;61(19):1504-1512. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-016-1157-0

Grechkina Victoria Vladimirovna, Cand. Sci (Biol.), Acting Head of Laboratory for Biological Testing and Expertise, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., Associate Professor, Department of Noncommunicable Animal Diseases, Orenburg State Agrarian University, 460014, Orenburg, Russia, 18 Chelyuskintsev, St.,  tel.: 8-922-877-14-97, e-mail: Viktoria1985too@mail.ru

Medvedev Sergey Anatolevich, Research Laboratory Assistant, Laboratory for Biological Testing and Expertises, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St. tel.: 8-922-551-78-27, e-mail: dis14@yandex.ru

Lebedev Svyatoslav Valerevich, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Leading Researcher, Laboratory for Biological Testing and Expertises, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St.,  tel.: 8-912-345-87-38, e-mail: lsv74@list.ru

Sheyda Elena Vladimirovna, Cand. Sci (Biol.), Researcher, Laboratory for Biological Testing and Expertises, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St.; Senior Researcher, Experimental Biological Clinic, 460018, Orenburg, Russia, Orenburg State University, 13 Pobedy Ave, 8-922-862-64-02, e-mail: elena-shejjda@mail.ru

Markova Irina Viktorovna, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Researcher Department of Technology of Beef Cattle Breeding and Beef Production, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., 29, tel.: 8-961-047-40-26, e-mail: irinazzz88@yandex.ru

Received: 12 July 2021; Accepted: 13 September 2021; Published: 30 September 2021

Download