Evaluation of the efficiency of feed use by young Hereford cattle
of different ecological and genetic groups
DOI: 10.33284/2658-3135-103-1-134
UDC 636.084.1:636.085.55
Acknowledgements:
Research was carried out according the plan of research scientific works on 2019-2021 yy. FSBSI FRC BST RAS (No 0761-2019-0012)
Evaluation of the efficiency of feed use by young Hereford cattle
of different ecological and genetic groups
Kinispay M Dzhulamanov, Nikolay P Gerasimov
Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agriotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Orenburg, Russia)
Summary. The development of highly efficient beef cattle is a priority task of selection and breeding work in cattle breeding. The aim of our work is a comparative description of young Hereford animals of different ecological and genetic groups in terms of feed efficiency. The studies were carried out on bulls and heifers of th Hereford breed, representing the groups of the Ural Hereford, Canadian breeding and their crosses. To assess the efficiency of feed use, the expected dry matter intake of animals was determined by solving multiple regression, taking into account the actual dry matter intake, average daily gain and metabolic body weight. The level of feeding of young animals was quite high, and the composition of diet in structure and energy value completely satisfied animal organism in all types of nutrients. Bulls and heifers of Canadian selection were significantly superior to their peers in terms of weight growth of 15 months. 40.0-58.8 kg (8.80-13.51%; P≤0.001) and 20.2-37.1 kg (5.27-10.12%; P≤0.001), respectively. As a result, models were identified to describe the predicted feed intake. Using the obtained models, indicators of residual feed intake (RFI) were established. Animals of foreign origin were characterized by better efficiency of feed use (-0.043 kg for bulls and -0.049 for heifers), based on the difference between actual and expected dry matter consumption. Young cattle of Russian selection was significantly inferior (by 0.077-0.092 kg of dry matter per day; P≤0.001) to Canadian animals in terms of the studied indicator. The inclusion of this parameter in breeding programs will create highly effective herds of beef cattle and increase the profitability of beef cattle breeding.
Key words: bulls, heifers, Hereford breed, feeding, weight growth, feed intake, dry matter, feed efficiency.
References
- Levakhin GI, Airikh VA, Duskayev GK. The focus is on creating a sustainable forage base. Dairy and Beef Cattle Breeding. 2005;6:27-29.
- Miroshnikov SA. Russian beef cattle: problems and solutions. Herald of Beef Cattle Breeding. 2011;64(3):7-12.
- Kalashnikov AP, e tal. Standards and diets of farm animals: Ref. book. 3rd ed., rework. and add. Moscow: Agropromizdat; 2003:456 p.
- Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. 2006. Residual feed intake (net feed efficiency) in beef cattle. AGRI-FACTS, July 2006, Agdex 420/11-1.
- Archer JA, Arthur PF, Herd RM, Parnell PF, Pitchford WS. Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency in British breed cattle. J Anim Sci. 1997;75(8):2024-2032. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7582024x
- Basarab JA, Price MA, Aalhus JL, Okine EK, Snelling WM, Lyle KL. Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle. Can J Anim. Sci. 2003;83:189-204. doi: 10.4141/A02-065
- Connor EE, Hutchison JL, Norman HD, Olson KM, Van Tassell CP, Leith JM, Baldwin RL. Use of residual feed intake in Holsteins during early lactation shows potential to improve feed efficiency through genetic selection. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:3978-3988. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5977
- Crews DH Jr. Genetics of efficient feed utilization and national cattle evaluation: a review. Genet Mol Res. 2005;4(2):152-165.
- Golden JW, Kerley MS, Kolath WH. The relationship of feeding behavior to residual feed intake in crossbred Angus steers fed traditional and no-roughage diets. J Anim Sci. 2008;86(1):180-186.
- Koch RM, Swiger LA, Chambers D, Gregory KE. Efficiency of fееd use in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 1963;22(2):486-494. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1963.222486x
- Nkrumah JD, Crews DH Jr, Basarab JA, Price MA, Okine EK, Wang Z, Li C, Moore SS. Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2007;85(10):2382-2390. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-657
- Van Arendonk JAM, Nieuwhof GJ, Vos H, Korver S. Genetic aspects of feed intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifers. Livest Prod Sci. 1991;29(4):263-275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(91)90103-W
Dzhulamanov Kinispay Murzagulovich, Dr Sci. (Agr.), Head of the Laboratory for Beef Cattle Breeding, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29 9 Yanvarya St., cell: 8-987-840-49-28, e-mail: kinispai.d@yandex.ru
Gerasimov Nikolay Pavlovich, Cand. Sci. (Agr.), Senior Researcher, Beef Cattle Breeding Department, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29 9 Yanvarya St., cell: 89123589617, e-mail: nick.gerasimov@rambler.ru
Received: 13 March 2020; Accepted: 16 March 2020; Published: 31 March 2020