Voskobulova N.I, Vereshchagina A.S, Uraskulov R.Sh.

DOI: 10.33284/2658-3135-103-3-229

UDC 633.16:631.8 (470.56)

Acknowledgements:

Research was carried out according the plan of research scientific works on 2019-2021 yy. FSBSI FRC BST RAS (No 0761-2019-0004)

The influence of biological preparations on the activity of stress enzymes and productivity

of spring barley

Nadezhda I Voskobulova, Antonina S Vereshchagina, Ruslan Sh Uraskulov

Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Orenburg, Russia)

Summary. To increase crop productivity biological preparations are used in modern cultivation technologies that take part in the regulation of physiological and biochemical processes in plants. Work objective was to study the effect of presowing seed treatment with biological preparations based on humic acids on the activity of antioxidant enzymes in spring barley plants and its productivity. The object of the study was spring barley of Natalie variety and the preparations Biohumus and Borogum M molybdenum. Field studies were carried out according to the method of Dospekhov BA. The antioxidant enzyme activity was determined in the phases of tillering, entering the tube, and the beginning of ear formation in plants. The total activity of superoxide dismutase was determined according to Giannopolitis, Ries, and catalase was determined spectrophotometrically. The studied preparations did not have a positive effect on the activity of superoxide dismutase in plants. The catalase activity in the treatment of barley seeds with Biohumus increased in plants in the tillering phase by 3.2%, in the tube -15.3%, the beginning of heading - 227.5%. Biohumus increased the number of plants per unit area, productive stems and grain yield. It is concluded that the use of Biohumus for presowing seed treatment can be a new way of biological plant protection.

Key words: spring barley, biological preparations, Biohumus, Borogum M molibdenum, superoxide dismutase, catalase, seeds, productivity, Orenburg region.

References

  1. Huseynova IM, Mamedov ACh, Sultanova NF. Antioxidant system of nanovirus-infected legumes. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2011;6:239.
  2. Polesskaya OG, Kashirina EI, Alekhina ND. Changes in the activity of antioxidant enzymes in wheat leaves and roots as a function of nitrogen source and supply. Plant Physiology. 2004;51(5):686-691.
  3. Rossikhina-Galycha AS, Likholat YV, Vynnychenka Activity of antioxidant ensymes of maize plants growing under the herbicide treatment. The North Caucasus Ecological Herald. 2014;10(4):30-34.
  4. Sokolov AA, Vinogradov DV, Kryuchkov MM. Influence of preseeding processing of seeds of barley biological products on efficiency of plants. International Technical-Economic Journal. 2015;5:93-99.
  5. Tyuterev SL. Scientific bases of induced plant disease resistance: monograph. : VIZR; 2002:328 p.
  6. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121-126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3
  7. Arora NK, editor. Plant microbe symbiosis: fundamentals and advances. Springer India; 2013:459 p. doi: 1007/978-81-322-1287-4
  8. Artlip TS, Wisnewski ME. Induction of proteins in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Handbook of plant and crop physiology. Pessarakli M, editor. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2001:657-680.
  9. Canellas LP, Teixeira Junior LRL, Dobbss LB, Silva SA, Medici LO, Zandonadi DB, Facanha AR. Humic acids crossinteractions with root and organic acids. Annals of Applied Biology. 2008;153(2):157-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00249.x
  10. Castrillo M, Fernandez D, Calcagno AM, Trujillo I, Guenni L. Responses of ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase, protein content, and stomatal condcutance to water deficit in maize, tomato, and bean. Photosynthetica. 2001;39:221-226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013731210309
  11. Delfine S, Tognetti R, Desiderio E, Alvino A. Effects of foliar application of N and humic acids on growth and  yield  of durum wheat. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2005;25(2):183-191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2005017
  12. Eyheraguibel B, Silvestre J, Morard P. Effects of humic substances derived from organic waste enhancement on the growth and mineral nutrition of maize. Bioresource Technology. 2008;99(10):4206-4212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.08.082
  13. Foyer CH, Noctor G. Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: regulation and signalling. New Phytologist. 2000;146(3):359-388. doi:1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00667.x
  14. Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dismutase: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977;59(2):309-314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.59.2.309
  15. Gratao PL, Polle A, Lea PJ, Azevedo RA. Making the life of heavy metal-stressed plants a little easier. Functional Plant Biology. 2005;32(6):481-494.
  16. O’Donnell RW. The auxin-like effects of humic preparations from leonardite. Soil Science. 1973;116(2):106-112.
  17. Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism   in   higher    Journal  of  Plant  Physiology. 2004;161(11):1189-1202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013
  18. Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley JA. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature. 2012;485:229-232. doi:10.1038/nature11069
  19. Vessey JK. Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil. 2003;255:571-586. doi: 10.1023/A:1026037216893
  20. Wang Z, Huang B. Physiological recovery of Kentucky bluegrass from simultaneous drought and heat stress. Crop Science. 2004;44(5):1729-1736. doi: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1729
  21. Wezel A, Casagrande M, Celette F, Vian JF, Ferrer A, Peigné J. Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. А. review. Agron. Sust. Dev. 2014;34:1-20. doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7
  22. Zhang X, Ervin E, Evanylo G, Sherony C, Peot C. Biosolids impact on tall fescue drought resistance. Journal of Residuals Science and Technology. 2005;2(3):174-180.
  23. Zhang X, Schmidt RE. Hormone-containing products’ impact on antioxidant status of tall fescue and creeping  bentgrass  subjected  to    Crop  Science. 2000;40(5):1344-1349. doi: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4051344x

Voskobulova Nadezhda Ivanovna, Cand. Sci. (Agr.), Leading Researcher, Head of Department Fodder Technologies, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460051, Orenburg, Russia,  27/1 Gagarin Avenue, tel.: 8(3532)30-83-48, cell phone: 8-919-864-34-40, e-mail: voskobulova1952@yandex.ru

Vereshchagina Antonina Sergeevna, Cand. Sci (Agr.), Senior Researcher, Department Fodder Technologies, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460051, Orenburg, Russia,  27/1 Gagarin Avenue, tel.: 8(3532) 30-83-48, cell phone: 8-919-853-17-26

Uraskulov Ruslan Shamilyevich, Senior Researcher, Department Fodder Technologies, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460051, Orenburg, Russia, 27/1 Gagarin Avenue, tel.: 8(3532) 30-83-48

Received: 20 July 2020; Accepted: 14 September 2020; Published: 30 September 2020

Download