Nadezhda M Shirnina, Baer S Nurzhanov, Ilmira A Rakhimzhanova, Valeriy V Kononets

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022. Vol. 105, no 2. Р. 49-59.

doi:10.33284/2658-3135-105-2-49

Increasing the efficiency of cow milk production when using cavitation-treated concentrates as part of diets

Nadezhda M Shirnina1, Baer S Nurzhanov2, Ilmira A Rakhimzhanova3,4, Valeriy V Kononets5

1,2,4,5Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Orenburg, Russia

3Orenburg State Agrarian University, Orenburg, Russia

1shirnina.2021@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-3865

2baer.nurzhanov@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-6112

3,4kaf36@orensau.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7771-7291

5vale056@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8482-4466

Abstract. The conducted studies on testing diets with the introduction of cavitated grain mixtures and wheat bran in comparison with traditional crushed grain mixture showed that during the main period[1] of the experiment (182 days) the highest average daily milk yield was in two experimental groups receiving cavitated concentrates as part of the diets. Their values in the experimental groups were 13.99 and 14.35 kg of milk, in the control group 11.37 kg, which is higher by 23.0 and 26.2%. Gross milk yield per head in control was - 2070 kg and two other experimental animals - 2545.2 and 2611.7 kg. An analysis of the content of milk fat and protein in cows of the experimental groups showed small differences, their values were in the range of 3.48-3.55% and 3.28-3.30%, respectively. The recalculation, adjusted for 3.4% basic fat content, from the actual content of the mass fraction of fat, had the accounting indicators of the milk receiving department higher in the control group by 60.88 kg (2.9%) and two experimental ones - 112.29 (4.4 %) and 61.45 kg (2.4%), respectively. An analysis of fat and protein content in the milked milk in the experimental groups of cows showed slight differences, so their values were in the range of 3.48-3.55% and 3.28-3.30%, respectively. In this regard, in base group of the animals the total content of "milk fat" and "mass fraction of proteins" for the main period of the experiment was 72.45, in I - 90.35 and II - 90.88 kg and 68.1; 84.0; 85.7 kg, or higher at 24.7 and 25.4% and 23.3 and 25.8%. Data on quality indicators of milk: DFMR, density, freezing point met the requirements of State Standard. Thus, their values were 8.25% in the base group according to DFMR, and 8.37% in the other two experimental groups; 8.40%, density - 1027.4 kg/m3; 1027.7; 1027.76 kg/m3, freezing point in all options of groups 0.529 °C and 0% water, respectively. The coefficient of milk production of the compared groups for the entire period of the experiment was 2.27; 2.81; 2.86 values.

Keywords: cows of the Red Steppe breed, diets, crushed grain mixture, cavitated grain mixture and wheat bran, milk productivity, quality indicators of milk

Acknowledgments: the work was performed in accordance to the plan of research works for 2021-2023 FSBRI FRC BST RAS (No. 0761-2019-0005).

For citation: Shirnina NM, Nurzhanov BS, Rakhimzhanova IA, Kononets VV. Increasing the efficiency of cow milk production when using cavitation-treated concentrates as part of diets. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022;105(2):49-59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-105-2-49

References

  1. Аzaubaeva GS. Natural resistance of cows when changing the period of lactation and energy nutrition. Chief Zootechnician. 2011;1:24-28.
  2. Baykov AS. On the feasibility of using cavitated feed grain and waste of flour milling in the diets of young cattle. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2020;1(103):158-167. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-103-1-158
  3. Nekrasov R, Varenikov M, Chabaev M, Anisova N, Anikin A, Pisarev V, Turchina V. Balancing of the metabolic energy level in the high productive cow rations during the early lactation. Dairy and Beef Cattle Farming. 2013;3:9-13.
  4. Kosolapov AV. Efficiency of using polysaccharides in feeding highly productive cows: abstract dis. … Cand. Sci. (Agricultural). Moscow; 2017:26 p.
  5. Khramtsov AG, et al. Increase of milk productivity of lactating cows. Dairy Industry. 2022;3:60-61. doi: 10.31515/1019-8946-2022-03-60-61
  6. Shirnina NM, Galiev BK, Rakhimzhanova IA, Baikov AS. Preparation of feeds using cavitation technology, contributing to an increase in the productivity of dairy cows (review). Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2021;4(90):266-270. doi: 10.37670/2073-0853-2021-90-4-266-270
  7. Suslova IA. Increasing the efficiency of milk production when using car-bohydrate concentrate by highly productive cows. [dissertation] Vologda-Molochnoe; 2012:143 p.
  8. Shirnina NM, Rakhimzhanova IA, Kononets VV. The use of energy by lactating cows of the red steppe breed when feeding rations with concentrates of various preparations. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2022;1(93):248-254. doi: 10.37670/2073-0853-2022-93-1-248-254
  9. Shchepilova KA, Koval'chuk AN. Innovative technology and equipment for the preparation of feed in the peasant farm "Schepilov’s S.V." (Conference proceedings). Student Science - a Look Into the Future: Materials of the All-Russian Student Scientific Conference Dedicated to 60th Anniversary of KrasGAU. Krasnoyarsk; 2012;4:275-277.
  10. Bhargava N, Mor RS, Kumar K, Sharanagat VS. Advances in application of ultrasound in food processing: A review. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021;70:105293. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105293
  11. Bonanno A, Di Grigoli A, Todaro M, Alabiso M, Vitale F, Di Trana A, Giorgio D, Settanni L, Gaglio R, Laddomada B, Di Miceli G. Improvement of oxidative status, milk and cheese production, and food sustainability indexes by addition of durum wheat bran to dairy cows' diet. Animals (Basel). 2019;9(9):698. doi: 10.3390/ani9090698
  12. Dehghan-banadaky M, Corbett R, Oba M. Effects of barley grain processing on productivity of cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2007;137(1-2):1-24. doi: 10.1016/J.ANIFEEDSCI.2006.11.021
  13. Koutsoumanis K, Alvarez‐Ordóñez A, Bolton D, Bover‐Cid S, Chemaly M, Davies R, Cesare A, Herman L, Hilbert F, Lindqvist R, Nauta M, Peixe L, Ru G, Simmons M, Skandamis P, Suffredini E, Castle L, Crotta M, Grob K, Milana MR, Petersen A, Sagués AXR, Silva FV, Barthélémy E, Christodoulidou A, Messens W, Allende A. The efficacy and safety of high‐pressure processing of food. EFSA J. 2022;20(3):e07128. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7128
  14. Mcgregor G, Oba M, Dehghan-banadaky M, Corbett R. Extent of processing of barley grain did  not  affect  productivity  of lactating dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2007;138(1-2):272-284. doi: 10.1016/J.ANIFEEDSCI.2006.11.023
  15. Neubauer V, Petri RM, Humer E,  Kröger I,  Reisinger N,  Baum-gartner W,  Wagner M,  Zebeli Q. Starch-rich diet induced rumen acido-sis and hindgut dysbiosis in dairy cows of different lactations. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(10):1727. doi: 10.3390/ani10101727
  16. Olukosi OA, Adeola O. Metabolizable energy content of meat and bone meal in corn-soybean meal or corn, wheat and soybean meal diets for broilers. The Journal of Poultry Science. 2009;47(3):244-249. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.009121
  17. Pinotti L, Ottoboni M, Giromini C, Dell’Orto V, Cheli F. Mycotoxin contamination in the EU feed supply chain: a focus on cereal by-products. Toxins (Basel). 2016;8(2):45. doi: 10.3390/toxins8020045
  18. Sadri H, Ghorbani GR, Alikhani M, Babaie M, Nikkhah A. Ground, dry-rolled and steam-processed barley grain for midlactation Holstein cows. Anim Feed Sci. Technol. 2007;138(2):195-204. doi: 10.1016/J.ANIFEEDSCI.2007.06.025
  19. Soltani A, Ghorbani GR, Alikhani M, Samie A, Nikkhah A. Ground versus steam-rolled barley brain for lactating cows: A clarification into conventional beliefs. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92(7):3299-3305. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1821

 Information about authors:

Nadezhda M Shirnina, Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Senior Researcher, Department of Farm Animal Feeding and Feed Technology named after Leushin SG, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8-987-891-96-55.

Baer S Nurzhanov, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Senior Researcher, Department of Farm Animal Feeding and Feed Technology named after Leushin SG, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8(3532)308-179

Ilmira A Rakhimzhanova, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Professor, Head of the Department of Electrical Technology and Electrical Equipment, Orenburg State Agrarian University, 460014, Orenburg, st. A.V. Kovalenko, 4, tel.: 8(3532)77-15-37; Consultant of the Department of Farm Animals Feeding and Feed Technology named after Leushin SG, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8(3532)308-179

Valeriy V Kononets, postgraduate student, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8-987-891-96-55.

The article was submitted 23.03.2022; approved after reviewing 25.05.2022; accepted for publication 14.06.2022.

Download