Yuliya V Matrosova, Аlexander A Ovchinnikov, Ludmila Yu Ovchinnikova, Dmitry S Bryukhanov, Karina A Nugumanova

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022. Vol. 105, no 2. Р. 60-69.

doi:10.33284/2658-3135-105-2-60

 Original article

Comparative assessment of the effect of probiotics on the growth rate and biochemical parameters of blood of broiler chickens

 Yuliya V Matrosova1, Аlexander A Ovchinnikov2, Ludmila Yu Ovchinnikova3, Dmitry S Bryukhanov4, Karina A Nugumanova5

1,2,3,4,5South Ural State Agrarian University, Troitsk, Russia

1vasilek_23@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0980-3195

2ovchin@bk.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7530-3159

3L.U.Ovchinnikova@bk.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-1729

4bryuhanovd@inbox.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-5048

5karinaximik@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7661-9182

 Abstract. Intestinal microflora plays a multifunctional role in the vital activity of body. Maintaining the development of normal microflora of poultry in commercial conditions is possible through the introduction of probiotic drugs. The use of probiotics Probitox and Probitox super in diets of broiler [1]chickens showed that they have positive effect on growth of poultry, so live weight by the end of fattening was higher by 1.8-2.7%, with an increase in liveability of experimental groups by 2-4%. Assessment of biochemical status of organism in experimental bird at the end of the first four-week rearing period showed that broilers receiving the tested feed additives had a tendency to have a higher intake of nitrogenous substances into blood and better used them. It is confirmed by the concentration of urea, the level of which decreased in blood serum of broiler chickens of group II in comparison with group I by 41.4% and by 50.0% in group III. The inclusion of Probitox feed additive in the diet of broiler chickens made it possible to reduce the consumption of compound feed by 2.8% per unit of live weight gain, and with the inclusion of Probitox plus, respectively, by 1.6%.

Keywords: broiler chickens, feeding, probiotic additive, live weight, blood biochemistry, liveability, feed costs

For citation: Matrosova YuV, Ovchinnikov AA, Ovchinnikova LYu, Bryukhanov DS, Nugumanova KA. Comparative assessment of the effect of probiotics on the  growth rate and biochemical parameters  of blood of broiler chickens. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022;105(2):60-69. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-105-2-60

References

  1. Vertiprakhov VG, Kostcheyeva MV. Hen blood biochemistry as the base of metabolism. Poultry and Poultry products. 2020;2:54-56. doi: 10.30975/2073-4999-2020-22-2-54-56
  2. Klimova TA, Sizentsov AN, Sizentsov YaA, Gubaidullina IZ. The effect of probiotic strains of Bacillus genus on blood biochemical parameters and copper concentration in animals. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2019;102(4):208-217. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-102-4-208
  3. Gulyushin SYu. Supplementation of feeds with probiotics requires adjustment of the dose to the expected storage term. Poultry Farming. 2021;12:27-30. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2021-70-12-27-30
  4. Egorova TA, Lenkova TN. The productive performance in broilers fed new probiotic containing bacillus licheniformis. Poultry Farming. 2021;6:25-28. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2021-70-6-25-28
  5. Salomatova EA, Slobozhaninov KV, Vereshchagina EN, Paderina RV. A probiotic in diet for laying hens. Poultry Farming. 2019;9-10:48-50. doi:10.33845/0033-3239-2019-68-9-10-48-50
  6. Lenkova TN, Egorova TA, Uvarova AS. Editing of the intestinal microbiota improves productivity in broilers. Poultry Farming. 2021;11:22-26. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2021-70-11-22-26
  7. Luneva AV. The effect of a fodder microbial additive on productivity of broiler chickens and quality of poultry meat. Agrarian Bulletin of Urals. 2021;10(213):55-64. doi: 10.32417/1997-4868-2021-213-10-55-64
  8. Melikidi VH, Tiurina DG, Selivanov DG, Novikova NI. Metabolites of probiotic bacteria are responsible for the effectiveness of probiotic "Profort®". Poultry Farming. 2019;9-10:45-47. doi:10.33845/0033-3239-2019-68-9-10-45-47
  9. Mitfakhutdinov AV, Saifulmuliukov ER. Features of protein metabolism in the body of broiler chickens when using the feed additive Peak-antistress in the diet. Vestnik NGAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University). 2020;4(57):103-110. doi: 10.31677/2072-6724-2020-57-4-103-110
  10. Tiurina DG, Laptev  GYu,  Novikova  NI, Ilyina LA, Yyldyrym EA, Dubrovin AV, Filippova VA, Brazhnik EA, Melikidi VKh. Consumer expectations regarding quality and safety of poultry meat as a driver for the substitution of antibiotic growth promoters in diets for broilers. Poultry Farming. 2021;1:49-53. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2021-70-1-49-53
  11. Koba IS, Gorbatova HS, Belkina YuS, Navruzshoeva GSh. Prophylaxis and therapy of salmonellosis in broilers by a combination of probiotics. Poultry Farming. 2021;2:54-57. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2021-70-2-54-57
  12. Egorov IA, Egorova TV, Krivoruchko LI, Brylin AP, Belyavskaya VA, Bolshakova DS. Probiotic in diets for broiler chicks. Poultry Farming. 2019;3:25-28. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2019-68-3-25-28
  13. Karamysheva NN, Gulyaeva LYu, Ulitko VYe, Pykhtina LA, Erisanova OE. Laying hens productivity and eggs consumer features when using diatomite-based probiotic additive in the diets. Poultry and Poultry Products. 2019;3:42-44. doi: 10.30975/2073-4999-2019-21-3-42-44
  14. Duskaev GK, Rakhmatullin ShG, Kwan OV, Nurzhanov BS, Ushakov AS, Levakhin GI. Рoultry productivity, blood biochemical values: the effect of Bacillus cereus and Coumarin. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2020;103(4):197-209. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-103-4-197
  15. Bochkareva EV, Ageev BV, Novikova NI, Bolshakov VN, Brazhnik EA. Opportunistic microbiota in layers: in the crosshairs of Cellobacterin®-T. Poultry Farming. 2019;6:37-42. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2019-68-6-37-42
  16. Shatskikh EV, Korolkova-Subbotkina DE, Galiev DM. Synbiotic supplements in diets for broilers. Poultry Farming. 2021a;5:25-28. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2021-70-5-25-28
  17. Shatskikh EV, Korolkova-Subbotkina DE, Kravtsova LZ. The effects of synbiotics HerbaStor and ProStor on the chemical composition of broiler meat. Poultry Farming. 2021b;11:28-32. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2021-70-11-28-32
  18. Shatskikh EV, Nufer AI, Galiev DM. The impact of natural alternative growth promoters on the productivity in broiler chicks. Poultry Farming. 2020;1:31-36. doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2020-69-1-31-36
  19. Miroshnikova EP, Kwan OV, Sheida EV, Rakhmatullin ShG. The effectiveness of the combined use of Soy-bifidum probiotic and plant extract in feeding broiler chickens. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2020;103(4):186-196. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-103-4-186

Information about authors:

Yuliya V Matrosova, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Animal Husbandry, South Ural State Agrarian University, 13 Gagarin St., Troitsk, Chelyabinsk Region, 457100, tel.: 8-9080609742.

Alexander А Ovchinnikov, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Professor of the Department of Feeding, Animal Hygiene, Technology of Production and Processing of Agricultural Products, South Ural State Agrarian University, 13 Gagarin St., Troitsk, Chelyabinsk Region, 457100, tel.: 8-9518034417.

Ludmila Yu Ovchinnikova, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Head of the Department of Biology, Ecology, Genetics and Animal Breeding, South Ural State Agrarian University, 457100, 13 Gagarin St., Troitsk, Chelyabinsk Region, tel.: 8-9000778735.

Dmitry S Bryukhanov, Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Associate Professor of the Department of Animal Husbandry, South Ural State Agrarian University, 13 Gagarin St., Troitsk, Chelyabinsk Region, 457100, tel.: 8-9925256444.

Karina А Nugumanova,  post-graduate student, South Ural State Agrarian University, 13 Gagarin St., Troitsk, Chelyabinsk Region, 457100, tel.: 7-7759376393.

The article was submitted 14.04.2022; approved after reviewing 27.05.2022; accepted for publication 14.06.2022.

Download