Pavel V Penkin, Natalia E Zemskova, Alexander G Meshcheryakov

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022. Vol. 104, no 4. Р. 208-219.

 doi:10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-208

FODDER PRODUCTION AND FODDERS

Original article

Effect of bioconservatives on fermentation processes in haylage

 Pavel V Penkin1, Natalia E Zemskova2, Alexander G Meshcheryakov3

1,2,3Samara State Agrarian University, Ust’-Kinelsky urban settlement, Samara region, Russia

1pasha.penkin@bk.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-5222

2zemskowa.nat@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5296-0674

3alidar@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0854-0939

Abstract. Silo Twice (patent 2781918) bioconservative, containing new strains of bacteria: Enterococcus faecium VOA-1 BCM V-28720 and Lactobacillus fermentum BCM B-5592 in addition to known ingredients, was used in the alfalfa haylage preparation. The functionality of the bioconservative showed high results in preservation of the main nutrients of the feed. The haylage obtained had an optimal level of dry matter and assimilable energy, relatively low values ​ ​ of residual sugars that guarantee aerobic stability; absolutely optimal ratio of fermentation acids, which contribute to good preservation and long storage life. Difficult-to-digest fractions of fiber were contained in a minimum amount, compared to haylage prepared using foreign-made ferments. All of the above positively affected the nutritional value and served as a factor reducing the metabolic burden on the digestive and endocrine systems in ruminants. The inclusion of Silo Twice bioconservative in the process of haylage preparation has a positive effect on the final product, ensuring the bioavailability of the components of the green mass for digestion and absorption of feed.

Keywords: haylage, Silo Twice bioconservative, bacteria, enzymes, digestibility

For citation: Penkin PV, Zemskova NE, Meshcheryakov AG. Effect of bioconservatives on fermentation processes in haylage. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022;105(4):208-219. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-208

References

  1. Fattakhova ZF, Shakirov ShK, Sharafutdinov GS, Khakimov IN. Alfalfa haylage biochemical indicators with biological preservatives in different storage time. Bulletin Samara State Agricultural Academy. 2020;4:60-66. doi: 10.12737/39910
  2. Vafin FR. Effect of feeding haylage harvested with biological preservative on rumen digestion of cows. Scientific notes Kazan Bauman State Academy of Veterinary Medicine. 2018;235(3):18-22. doi: 10.31588/2413-4201-1883-235-3-18-22
  3. ARSRI of fodder. Agriculture. UniversityAgro.ru. [Internet]. Available from: https://universityagro.ru/растениеводство/люцерна/ (cited: 19.11.2022).
  4. Volkova GS, Kuksova EV. The use of preservatives of various nature for the preparation of feed. Efficient animal husbandry. 2020;3(160):124-125. doi: 10.24411/9999-007А-2020-10013
  5. Kutuzova AA, Teberdiyev DM, Rodionova AV, Zhezmer NV, Provornaja EE. Innovative resource of production of high-quality bulky feeds on native hayfields. Achievements of Science and Technology of the Agro-Industrial Complex. 2018;2:40-43. doi: 10.24411/0235-2451-2018-10210
  6. Mironov NA, Karamayeva AS, Karamayev SV. Milk productivity and quality when feeding cows senage with the bioconservant "Greengrass 3×3". Izvestiya Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2022;2(94):292-299. doi: 10.37670/2073-0853-2022-94-2-292-299
  7. Zabashta NN, Golovko EN, Marchenko AY, Izhevsk NG. Soft hay and haylage from cereals and legumes. Collection of Scientific Papers of KRCAHVM. 2022;1:285-289. doi: 10.48612/sbornik-2022-1-71
  8. Volobueva ES, et al. Features of the cultivation of Propionibacterium shermanii strain. Polythematic Online Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agrarian University. 2015;114:1156-1169.
  9. Marchenko AYu, et al. Digestibility of preserved haylage in sheep. Collection of Scientific Papers of KRCAHVM. 2021;2:18-23. doi: 10.48612/sbornik-2021-2-4
  10. Pobednov YuA, Mamaev AA, Shirokorad MS. Study of accumulation of fermentation products during making silage and haylage of alfalfa in conditions of spontaneous fermentation and the use of preserving preparation. Problemy biologii productivnykh zhivotnykh [Problems of Productive Animal Biology]. 2019;2:89-98. doi: 10.25687/1996-6733.prodanimbiol.2019.2.89-98
  11. Pogozhev AR, Rtishcheva NE, Rtishchev KP, Gasparyan IN. The profitability of harvesting silage on farms. (Conference proceedings) Youth scientific forum: electr. digest of articles based on the materials of the CXI student international scientific and practical conf. Moscow: «MCNO» Publishing House. 2021;1(111):62-67. [Electronic resource]. https://nauchforum.ru/archive/MNF_interdisciplinarity/1(111).pdf (cited: 24.11.2022).
  12. Baryshnikov PI, et al. Productivity of lactating cows fed on a diet of haylage from a vetch pea-oat mixture with the introduction of new biological preservative. Herald of Dnepropetrovsk University. Biology. Ecology. 2016;24(2):430-436. doi:10.15421/011658
  13. Union of biological agriculture. About the project [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://nosbz.ru/pages/about.html (cited: 12.11.2022).
  14. Yunin VA, Zakharov AM, Zykov AV. Parameters of the distribution process of preservatives in plant raw materials. Meždunarodnyj naučno-issledovatel'skij žurnal (International Research Journal). 2022;1-1(115):89-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2022.115.1.017
  15. Coblentz WK, Bertram MG. Effects of a propionic acid-based preservative on storage characteristics, nutritive value, and energy content for alfalfa hays packaged in large round bales. Journal of Dairy Science. 2012;95(1):340-352. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4496
  16. Coblentz WK, Ogden RK, Akins MS, Chow EA. Nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of alfalfa-mixed grass forage wrapped with minimal stretch film layers and stored for different lengths of time. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016;100(7):5293-5304. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12404
  17. Đorđević S, Mandić V et al. Bacterial inoculant effect on quality of alfalfa silage and haylage. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 2019;35(1):85-96. doi: 10.2298/BAH1901085D
  18. Liu C, Lai YJ, Lu XN, Guo PT, Luo HL. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage quality: assessment of degradation (in situ) and gas production (in vitro). Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2016;15(12):2834-2841. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61424-7

Information about the authors:

Pavel V Penkin, Candidate of the Department of "Animal Science", Samara State Agrarian University, 2, Uchebnaya str., Kinel’, Ust’-Kinelsky urban settlement, 446442, tel.: 89165504055.

Natalia E Zemskova, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of "Animal Science", Samara State Agrarian University, 2, Uchebnaya str., Kinel’, Ust’-Kinelsky urban settlement, 446442, tel.: 89879261712.

Alexander G Meshcheryakov, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Professor of the Department of "Animal Science", Samara State Agrarian University, 2, Uchebnaya str., Kinel’, Ust’-Kinelsky urban settlement, 446442, tel.: 89279069362.

The article was submitted 16.11.2022; approved after reviewing 29.11.2022; accepted for publication 12.12.2022.

Download