Antonina A Novikova , Anastasia A Emelyanova, Anastasia A Pustovalova, Olga S Grechishkina, Tatyana A Mishenina, Maxim V Zamerzlyak

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022. Vol. 105, no 4. Р. 220-231.

doi:10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-220

GEOPONICS AND CROP PRODUCTION

Original article

Assessment of ecological plasticity and stability of spring barley varieties by yield in the conditions of Orenburg region

 Antonina A Novikova1 , Anastasia A  Emelyanova2, Anastasia A Pustovalova3,

Olga S Grechishkina4, Tatyana A Mishenina5, Maxim V Zamerzlyak6

1,2,3,4,5,6Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Orenburg, Russia

1tony-novikova@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-9262

2a_a_emelyanova@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-1679

3a.p.anatolevna@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-002-0472-0019

4vip.olga1979@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4054-3048

5tanya-mishenina@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-4111

6maksim.zamerzlyak@mail.ru

 Abstract. The article presents the data of a three-year variety testing of spring barley in the conditions of Orenburg region. The study was carried out on 10 varieties currently or previously approved for cultivation in the Ural region of varietal zoning in Russia. Ecological plasticity (bi) and ecological stability (σd2) were calculated to assess the ecological adaptability of the studied varieties. The results of the calculations are analyzed and presented in the form of tables and graphs. The most environmentally plastic and stable varieties that have shown high yields in changing growing conditions have been identified. Calculations have shown that Orenburgskiy 11 and Pamyati Chepeleva varieties are the most plastic among the studied varieties of spring barley. Anna and Donetskiy 8 varieties were the most stable according to the test results. Varieties with high stability have a constant yield on the background of variable environmental conditions. As a result of the data obtained, it is possible to judge the ecological plasticity and stability of the studied spring barley varieties. Anna and Pamyati Chepeleva varieties have a plastic and at the same time stable yield in various climatic conditions according to the combination of the linear regression coefficient and the standard deviation.

Keywords: spring barley, variety testing, yield, ecological stability, ecological plasticity, adaptability

 Acknowledgments: the work was supported by Department of Science and High Education of Russian  Federation  in  the  form  of  a  subsidy  for the creation of a breeding and seed center, project No. 075-15-2021-563.

For citation: Novikova AA, Emelyanova AA, Pustovalova AA, Grechishkina OS, Mishenina TA, Zamerzlyak MV. Assessment of ecological plasticity and stability of spring barley varieties by yield in the conditions of Orenburg region. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022;105(4):220-231. https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-220

References

  1. Belyakov AM. Variety testing system as a factor of ensuring the growth of crop productivity. Scientific agronomic journal. 2020;1(108):31-34. doi: 10.34736/FNC.2020.108.1.006.31-34
  2. Bisharev AA, Shevchenko SN, Madyakin EV, et al. The influence of agrometeorological conditions on grain yield of spring barley in the conditions of Middle Volga Region. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018;20(2-4):667-670.
  3. Dubachinskaya NN, Dubachinskaya NN, Tishkov NI, et al. Influence of agroecological factors on the productivity of grain crop varieties and efficiency of their use in seed production of the steppe zone of Preduralye. Proceedings of the Kuban State Agrarian University. 2020;84:147-153. doi: 10.21515/1999-1703-84-147-153
  4. Gulyanov YuA, Polyakov DG, Grosheva OA. Modern challenges to sustainable land use and the yield potential of field crops in agriculture of the steppe and forest -steppe zones of Russia. Problems of Steppe Science. 2021;3:105-118. doi: 10.24412/2712-8628-2021-3-105-118
  5. Dospekhov BA. Field experiment methodology: (with the basics of statistical processing of research results). 5th ed., Add. and revised. Moscow: Agropromizdat; 1985:351 p.
  6. Zotikov VI. The role of genetic resources in improving the productivity and environmental sustainability of crop production. Zernobobovye i krupânye kul'tury (Legumes and Groat Crops). 2017;2(22):4-8.
  7. Malokostova EI. Results of research of ecological adaptivity and stability of spring hard wheat in the conditions of the south-east of the central black soil zone. Vestnik of the Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2019;4(48):66-69. doi: 10.18286/1816-4501-2019-4-66-69
  8. Stolpivskaya EV, Kukushkina LA, Zemlyankina YuN, Vukolov VV. Assessment of breeding material of spring barley by parameters of ecological plasticity. Izvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018;20(2-4):692-695.
  9. Filippov EG, Bragin RN, Dontsova AA, Dontsov DP. Assessment of ecological plasticity and stability of spring barley. Taurida Herald of the Agrarian Sciences. 2021; 3(27):172-179. doi: 10.33952/2542-0720-2021-3-27-172-179
  10. Zorov AA, Tishkov NI, Tishkov DN, Tymoshenkova TA. Selection of spring barley in the Orenburg region. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2021;6(92):65-73. doi: 10.37670/2073-0853-2021-92-6-65-73
  11. Zakharova OA, Cherkasov OV, Evsenkin KN, et al. Statistical studies of barley production in Ryazan region and the forecast of crop yield. Herald of the Ryazan State Agrotechnological University named after P.A. Kostychev. 2022;14(1):19-26. doi: 10.36508/ RSATU.2022.85.8 5.002
  12. Hmil' IV,Chernjad'eva NA. Combating climate change as a sustainable development goal: international legal analysis. Ocean Management. 2021;3(12):15-19.
  13. Yusova OA, Nikolaev PN. Efficiency of application of various methods for plasticity and stability calculation of varieties on the example of spring barley. Vestnik of the Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2021;1(53):98-104. doi: 10.18286/1816-4501-2021-1-98-104
  14. Elakhdar A, Solanki S, Kubo T, Abed A, Elakhdar I, Khedr R, Hamwieh A, Capo-chichi LJA, Abdelsattar M, Franckowiak JD, Qualset CO. Barley with improved drought tolerance: Challenges and perspectives. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2022;201:104965. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104965
  15. Gammans M,  Mérel P,  Ortiz-Bobea A. Negative impacts of climate change on cereal yields: statistical evidence from France. Environmental Research Letters. 2017;12:054007. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6b0c
  16. Hakala K, Jauhiainen L, Rajala A, Jalli M, Kujala M, Laine A. Different responses to weather events may change the cultivation balance of spring barley and oats in the future. Field Crops Research. 2020;259:107956. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107956
  17. He T, Angessa T, Hill CB, Zhang X-Q, Telfer P, Westcott S, Li C. Genetic solutions through breeding counteract climate change and secure barley production in Australia. Crop Design. 2022;1(1):100001. doi: 10.1016/j.cropd.2021.12.001
  18. Hill CB, Angessa TT, McFawn LA, Wong D, Tibbits J, Zhang XQ,  Forrest K,  Moody D,  Telfer P,  Westcott S,  Diepeveen D,  Li C. Hybridisation-based target enrichment of phenology genes to dissect the genetic basis of yield and adaptation in barley. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019;17(5):932-944. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13029
  19. Reynolds MP,  Pask AJ,  Hoppitt WJ,   Sonder K,   Sukumaran S, Molero G, Saint Pierre C,  Payne T,  Singh RP,  Braun HJ,   Gonzalez FG, et al.  Strategic  crossing  of  biomass  and  harvest index—source and sink—achieves genetic gains in wheat. Euphytica. 2017;213:257. doi: 10.1007/s10681-017-2040-z
  20. Shah SAA, Luo H,  Pickupana PD,  Ekeze A,  Sohel F,  Laga H,  Li C,  Paynter B,  Wang P. Automatic and fast classification of barley grains from images: A deep learning approach. Smart Agricultural Technology. 2022;2:100036. doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2022.100036

Information about authors:

Antonina A Novikova, Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Leading Researcher, Head of the Laboratory for Breeding and Genetic Research in Plant Growing, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051, tel.: 89228884481.

Anastasia A Pustovalova, master student, Laboratory Researcher, Laboratory of Selection and Genetic Research in Crop Production, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051.

Anastasia A  Emelyanova, master student, laboratory researcher, laboratory of Selection and Genetic Research in Crop Production, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051, tel.: 89198526182.

Olga S Grechishkina, Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Researcher, Head of the Laboratory for spring barley breeding, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051, tel.: 89225314123.

Tatyana A Mishenina, specialist, Laboratory of Selection and Genetic Research in Crop Production, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051, tel.: 89225361286.

Maxim V Zamerzlyak, agronomist, Laboratory of Selection and Genetic Research in Crop Production, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051, tel.: 89228884496.

The article was submitted 17.10.2022; approved after reviewing 03.11.2022; accepted for publication 12.12.2022.

Download