Antonina A Novikova, Anastasia A Pustovalova, Anastasia A Emelyanova, Olga S Grechishkina, Tatyana A Mishenina, Maxim V Zamerzlyak

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022. Vol. 105, no 4. Р. 246-257.

 doi:10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-246

 Original article

The results of the properties test of stability and plasticity in durum wheat of Orenburg region

 Antonina A Novikova1, Anastasia A Pustovalova2, Anastasia A Emelyanova3, Olga S Grechishkina4, Tatyana A Mishenina5, Maxim V Zamerzlyak6

1,2,3,4,5,6Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Orenburg, Russia

1tony-novikova@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-9262

2a.p.anatolevna@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-002-0472-0019

3a_a_emelyanova@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-1679

4vip.olga1979@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4054-3048

5tanya-mishenina@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-4111

6maksim.zamerzlyak@mail.ru

 Abstract: Orenburg region is one of the leading regions in grain crops cultivation such as soft and durum wheat. Today durum wheat is in high demand on the Russian market, which is confirmed[1] by the increasing volumes in pasta production from durum varieties. The composition of black soil and the dry-steppe climate in Orenburg region contribute to a favorable yield of high-quality grain. Constant changes in growing conditions and sudden changes in weather conditions prevent obtaining high yields. Yield is a key indicator by which the ecological plasticity and stability of varieties are determined. According to these characteristics, it is possible to determine other adaptive properties of the studied varieties and select the most resistant samples to climatic changes in the environment. Adaptive properties, stability and plasticity were studied for 12 durum wheat varieties according to yield indicators for 3 years (2018-2020). Bezenchukskaya niva, Bezenchukskaya stepnaya, Orenburgskaya 10 and Orenburgskaya 21 were identified as the most plastic varieties according to the linear regression coefficient of yield. These varieties have greater responsiveness to a high level of agricultural technology. As a result of the conducted research, Khar’kovskaya 46, Donskaya elegiya, Bezenchukskaya zolotistaya were identified as the most environmentally plastic and stable durum wheat varieties.

Keywords: durum wheat, variety, productivity, ecological stability, ecological plasticity, adaptability

  Acknowledgments: the work was supported by Department of Science and High Education of Russian  Federation  in  the  form  of  a  subsidy  for the creation of a breeding and seed center, project No. 075-15-2021-563.

For citation: Novikova AA, Pustovalova AA, Emelyanova AA, Grechishkina OS, Mishenina TA, Zamerzlyak MV. The results of the properties test of stability and plasticity in durum wheat of Orenburg region. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022;105(4):246-257. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-246

References

  1. Belyakov AM. Variety testing system as a factor of ensuring the growth of crop productivity. Scientific agronomy journal. 2020;1(108):31-34. doi: 10.34736/FNC.2020.108.1.006.31-34
  2. Grechishkina OS, Khutambirdina RD, Mordvintsev MP. Amount and structure of grain yield of spring soft wheat varieties in various types of drought conditions. Animal husbandry and fodder production. 2021;104(4):217-232. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-104-4-217
  3. Detsyna AA, Illarionova IV, Shcherbinina VO. Estimation of environmental plasticity and stability of confectionary sunflower varieties. Oilseeds. 2019;3(179):35-39. doi: 10.25230/2412–608Х–2019–3–179–35–39
  4. Dospekhov BA. Field experiment methodology: (with the basics of statistical processing of research results). 5-th edition, supplemented and revised. Moscow: Agropromizdat; 1985:351 p.
  5. Eliseev VI, Sandakova GN. Dependence of spring soft wheat yield on weather conditions and mineral nutrition in Orenburg Cis-Urals. (Conference proceedings) Scientific support of innovative development of agriculture in conditions of frequent droughts: Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conf., dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Orenburg SRIA, (Orenburg, 19-20 July 2017). Orenburg: "Agentstvo "Pressa" Ltd.; 2017:233-240.
  6. Pushkarev DV, Chursin AS, Kuz'min OG, KrasnovaYuS, Karakoz II, Shamanin VP. Correlation of yield with elements of productivity of varieties of spring soft wheat in the conditions of the steppe zone of the Omsk region. Vestnik of Omsk State Agrarian University. 2018;3(31):26-35.
  7. Malokostova EI. Results of research of ecological adaptivity and stability of spring hard wheat in the conditions of the south-east of the central black soil zone. Vestnik of Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2019;4(48):66-69. doi: 10.18286/1816-4501-2019-4-66-69
  8. Mejliev AH, Toshmetova FN. Selection of durum wheat varieties with predominant economically valuable characteristics. Life Sciences and Agriculture. 2020;2-3(7):38-41. doi: 10.24411/2181-0761/2020-10089
  9. Mukhitov LA, Timoshenkova TA. Varieties of spring durum wheat adapted to the conditions of the steppe of the Ural region. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2021;3(89):15-19. doi: 10.37670/2073-0853-2021-89-3-15-19
  10. Cheshkova AF, Grebennikova IG, Aleynikov AF, Chanyshev DI. Implementation of methods for assessing the stability of crop varieties in the agrostab package of function of R software environment. Achievements of science and technology of the agro-industrial complex. 2020;34(7):91-96. doi 10.24411/0235-2451-2020-10716.
  11. Sapega VA, Tursumbekova GSh. Yield, ecological plasticity and stability of spring soft and durum wheat varieties in the southern forest steppe of Tyumen region. Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2020;21(2):114-123. doi: 10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.2.114-123
  12. Balykin SV et al., editors. The system of sustainable development of agriculture in Orenburg region. Irkutsk: «Megaprint» Ltd.; 2019:335 p.
  13. Cai Y, Guan K, Lobell D, Potgieter AB, et al. Integrating satellite and climate data to predict wheat yield in Australia using machine learning approaches. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2019;274:144-159. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.010
  14. Correndo AA, Hefley TJ, Holzworth DP, Ciampitti IA. Revisiting linear regression to test agreement in continuous predicted-observed datasets. Agricultural Systems 2021;192:103194. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103194
  15. Feng P, Wang B, Liu DL, Waters C, et al. Dynamic wheat yield forecasts are improved by a hybrid approach using a biophysical model and machine learning technique. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2020;285-286:107922. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107922
  16. Li L, Wang B, Fang P, Liu DL, Qinsi H, et al. Developing machine learning models with multi-source environmental data to predict wheat yield in China. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2022;194:106790. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106790
  17. Lozhkin AG, Malchikov PN, Makushev AE, Vasiliev OA, Shashkarov LG, Pushkarenko NN. Evaluation of spring durum wheat varieties by yield, structure and grain quality. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science: International AgroScience Conference (AgroScience-2019) 1-2 June 2019, Cheboksary, Russia. Bristol, England: IOP Publishing; 2020;433:012045. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/433/1/012045
  18. Malchikov PN, Rozova MA, Ziborov AI, Myasnikova MG, Chakheeva TV. Challenges and opportunities of breeding and genetic improvement of durum wheat in Russia. In: Kochetov A, Salina E, editors. Current Challenges in Plant Genetics, Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Biotechnology. Proceedings of the Fifth International Scientific Conference PlantGen2019 (June 24-29, 2019, Novosibirsk, Russia). Novosibirsk: ICG SB RAS; 2019:207-210. doi: 10.18699/ICG-PlantGen2019-67
  19. Meuwissen MPM, Feindt PH, Spiegel A, Termeer CJAM, et al. A framework to assess the resilience of farming systems. Agricultural Systems. 2019;176:102656. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102656
  20. Nan Gu, Zhang J, Wang G, Liu C, Wang Z, Lü H. An atmospheric and soil thermal-based wheat crop coefficient method using additive crop growth models. Agricultural Water Management. 2022;269:107691. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107691

Information about authors:

Antonina A Novikova, Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Leading Researcher, Head of the Laboratory for Breeding and Genetic Research in Plant Growing, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051, tel.: 89228884481.

Anastasia A Pustovalova, master student, Laboratory Researcher, Laboratory of Selection and Genetic Research in Crop Production, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051.

Anastasia A  Emelyanova, master student, Laboratory Researcher, Laboratory of Selection and Genetic Research in Crop Production, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051, tel.: 89198526182.

Olga S Grechishkina, Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Researcher, Head of the Laboratory for spring barley breeding, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051, tel.: 89225314123

Tatyana A Mishenina, specialist, Laboratory of Selection and Genetic Research in Crop Production, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051, tel.: 89225361286.

Maxim V Zamerzlyak, agronomist, Laboratory of Selection and Genetic Research in Crop Production, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 27/1 Gagarin Ave., Orenburg, 460051, tel.: 89228884496.

 The article was submitted 17.10.2022; approved after reviewing 28.11.2022; accepted for publication 12.12.2022.

Download