Elena V Kosolapova, Nikolai N Kuchin

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2023. Vol. 106, no 3. Р. 190-201.

 

doi:10.33284/2658-3135-106-3-190

 

Original article

Influence of a combination of bacterial and chemical preparations on the quality of fermentation

in the conservation of damp rolled barley grain

 

Elena V Kosolapova1, Nikolai N Kuchin2

1,2Nizhny Novgorod State University of Engineering and Economics, Knyaginino, Russia

1 K-art-inka@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0793-0847

2nkuchin53@mail.ru

 

Abstract. Damp rolled grain is characterized by a specific composition of epiphytic microflora, a special biochemical composition with a high content of nutrients. To ensure the predominance of homofermentative lactic fermentation, stringent requirements are imposed on the technology of its conservation. One of the key points here is sufficient acid formation to lower the pH to optimal limits and suppress unwanted microflora. Chemical conservation is considered the most effective way to preserve the grain mass, but this is a rather expensive undertaking. The use of bacterial preparations does not always give reliable results. A compromise way out of this situation, in our opinion, is the combined use of chemical and biological preservatives. We have studied the conservation of wet flaked barley with separate application of the chemical preservative Tekacid at variable doses of 5, 3 and 1.5 l/t, and then the bacterial preparation Biosill NN to saturate the mass with homofermentative osmotolerant lactic acid bacteria in comparison with self-preservation and separate processing by chemical and biological preparations. It was found that a combined treatment of grain at a dose of Tekacid in mixtures of 3 and 1.5 l/t had the best effect on acid formation, the content and ratio of fermentation acids, acidification.

Keywords: barley, rolled grain, bacterial preparation, combined canning, fermentation, chemical preservative

For citation: Kosolapova EV, Kuchin NN. Influence of a combination of bacterial and chemical preparations on the quality of fermentation in the conservation of damp rolled barley grain. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2023;106(3):190-201. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-106-3-190

 

References

 
  1. Emelyanova EV, Kuchin NN. Degree of acidification of raw fodder grain depending on preservation conditions. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2020;5:49-57. doi: 10.26897/0021-342X-2020-5-49-57
  2. Konovalova NYu, Konovalova SS. Influence of harvesting time of cereal crops on the productivity and the quality of the forage in the conditions of the European North of Russia. Dairy Farming Journal. 2018;1(29):46-56. doi: 10.24411/2225-4269-2018-00005
  3. Simonov GA, Nikiforov VE, Maklakhov AV, Khalizova ZN, Simonov AG. Determination of the moisture content of fodder grain during its production. Effective Animal Husbandry. 2023;4(186):92-94. doi: 10.24412/cl-33489-2023-4-92-94
  4. Pilyuk NV, Khodarenok EP, Vansovich AS, Kurepin AA, Apanovich TV. Nutritional value of cereal and legume silos using biological and chemical preservatives. Actual Problems of Intensive Development of Animal Husbandry: Collection of Works in Two Parts. 2018;21(1):201-207.
  5. Pobedinov YuA, Mamaev AA. Intensity of alcoholic fermentation, depending on the degree of grass drying, the availability of sugar, as well as its role in the occurrence of aerobic spoilage of silage and haylage. Adaptive Fodder Production. 2019;1(37):55-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.33814/AFP-2222-5366-2019-1-56-68
  6. Pozdnyakova VF, Latysheva OV, Ivanov AV. Reducing economic losses through the use of Fermasil and Vitasil preservatives in a modern industrial dairy complex. Effective Animal Husbandry. 2020;4(161):52-54. doi: 10.24411/9999-007A-2020-10022
  7. Popov VV. Rolled preserved grain: technology, quality, efficacy. Adaptive Fodder Production. 2018;3:63-82.
  8. Kuchin NN, Kosolapova EV, Kosolapov VV. Green mass preservation method: patent 2614799 Rus. Federation. Appl. 06/24/15; оpubl. 01/10/17, Bull. No. 10.
  9. Tsykunova OV, Kodochilova NA. Efficiency of the application chemical and biological preparations for canning of flattened grain of barley in the conditions of the Nizhny Novgorod region. International Agricultural Journal. 2020;63(6)(378):83-85. doi: 10.24411/2587-6740-2020-16121
  10. Chukhina OV, Demidova AI. The effect of adding perennial grasses of the second moving to the flattened spring barley grain for its storage in air-tight conditions. Dairy Farming Journal. 2019;1(33):59-69. doi: 10.24411/2225-4269-2019-00006
  11. Moiseeva MO, Shloma TM, Zenkova NN et al. Efficiency of the use of biological preservatives in ensilement of wet crimped corn and air-dried clover. Transactions of the educational establishment “Vitebsk the Order of “the Badge of Honor” State Academy of Veterinary Medicine”. 2021;57(1):103-108. doi: 10.52368/2078-0109-2021-57-1-103-108
  12. Fedak N, Chumachenko S, Darmogray L,  Kravchenko N.  Effectiveness  of  probiotics  use in  the  preservation  of  fodder  grain  of  high-humidity.  Știința  Agricolă. 2020;1:167-172. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3911647
  13. Bikel D et al. Nutritive value for high-yielding lactating cows of barley silage and hay as a substitute for wheat silage and hay in low-roughage diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2020;265:114498. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114498
  14. Franco M, Tapio I, Rinne M. Preservation characteristics and bacterial communities of crimped ensiled barley grains modulated by moisture content and additive application. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1092062. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1092062
  15. Huuskonen A, Rinne M, Manni K. Effects of different barley grain preservation techniques on intake, growth and carcass traits of finishing dairy bulls fed grass silage-based rations. J Agric Sci. 2021;158(8-9):748-755. doi: 10.1017/S0021859621000022
  16. Kosolapova E, Kuchin N, Kosolapov V et al. Energy-saving technology of high-protein silage preservation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. International Conference on Production and Processing of Agricultural Raw Materials. Voronezh, 26-29 Febryary 2020. 2021;640:032038. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/640/3/032038
  17. Rinne M et al. Effects of grass silage additive type and barley grain preservation method on rumen fermentation, microbial community and milk production of dairy cows. Agriculture. 2022;12(2):266. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12020266
  18. Sun L, Na N, Li X, Li Z, Wang C, Wu X, Xiao Y, Yin G, Liu S, Liu Z, Xue Y, Yang F. Impact of packing density on the bacterial community, fermentation, and in vitro digestibility of whole-crop barley silage. Agriculture. 2021;11(7):672. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11070672
  19. Sutherland BD, Johnson JA, McKinnon JJ, McAllister TA, Penner GB. Use of barley silage or corn silage with dry-rolled barley, corn, or a blend of barley and corn on predicted nutrient total tract digestibility and growth performance of backgrounding steers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2020;101(1):62-70. doi: 10.1139/cjas-2019-0198
 

Information about the authors:                                                                                             

Elena V Kosolapova, Cand. Sci. (Agriculture), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Information Systems and Technologies, Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University, 22a October St., Knyaginino, 606340; tel.: 89101385897.

Nikolai N Kuchin, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Professor, Professor of the Department of Technical Service, Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University, 22a October St., Knyaginino, 606340.

 

The article was submitted 24.07.2023; approved after reviewing 14.08.2023; accepted for publication 11.09.2023.

Download