Roman A Tuzikov, Svyatoslav V Lebedev, Maria S Arinzhanova, Elena V Sheida

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2023. Vol. 106, no 3. Р. 138-147.

 

doi:10.33284/2658-3135-106-3-138

 

Original article

The influence of biomineral complex on the growth, productive traits in broiler chickens

 

Roman A Tuzikov1, Svyatoslav V Lebedev2, Maria S Arinzhanova3, Elena V Sheida4

1,2,3,4Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Orenburg, Russia

1romantuzikov56@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9730-4454

2lsv74@list.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9485-7010

3marymiroshnikova@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-9307

4elena-shejjda@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-613X

 

Abstract. The article studied the positive effect of the complex of Cu, Mn, Fe glycinates and "Lactobifadol forte" probiotic preparation on meat productivity and metabolic processes in the body of broiler chickens. The slaughter indicators and meat quality, as well as the features of the chemical elements accumulation  in  the  muscle  tissue  of  poultry  were studied. Ross-308 broiler chickens were divided into 5 groups  (n=30)  by  the  method  of analogue pairs and kept in group cages. Control group was fed with the basic diet, I experimental group received the basic diet with Cu (10 mg/kg), Mn (270 mg/kg) and Fe (200 mg/kg ) glycinates, II experimental group - basic diet + probiotic preparation at a dose of 0.5 g/kg of feed + glycinates (Cu (10 mg/kg), Mn (270 mg/kg) and Fe (200 mg/kg)); III experimental group - basic diet + probiotic (0.7 g/kg) + glycinates (Cu (10 mg/kg), Mn (270 mg/kg) and Fe (200 mg/kg)); IV experimental  group  -  basic  diet + probiotic (1 g/kg) + glycinates (Cu (10 mg/kg), Mn (270 mg/kg) and Fe (200 mg/kg)). The use of a feed additive with a complex of glycinates and probiotic in feeding broiler chickens increases the pre-slaughter live weight by 9.7-11,0%, gutted carcass weight by 3.1-14.1%, slaughter yield by 0.5-2.5%. The complex feed additive showed a decrease in feed costs per 1 kg of gain from 1.82 kg for the control group to 1.55 kg for the group treated with a probiotic at a dose of 0.7 g/kg and a complex of glycinates. An increase in fat by 2.2% and protein by 2.4%, as well as Ca, K, Mg, Na, P and most conditionally essential and essential elements was also noted in chicken meat from this group.

Keywords: poultry farming, broiler chickens, feeding, muscle tissue, mineral composition, probiotic preparation, Lactobifadol forte

Acknowledgments: the work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Project            No. 21-16-00009.

For citation: Tuzikov RA, Lebedev SV, Arinzhanova MS, Sheida EV. The influence of biomineral complex on the growth, productive traits in broiler chickens. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2023;106(3):138-147. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-106-3-138

 

References

 
  1. Vasilevich SF. Biological properties of probiotic mineral-carbohydric adhesive "Sorbolin" and its components. Veterinary, Zootechnics and Biotechnology. 2017;8:56-62.
  2. Kvan OV et al. Effect of the probiotic strain Bifidobacterium Longumon the content of chemical elements in biological tissues of broiler chickens with a mineral-deficient diet. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2020;S14:28-34. doi: 10.32417/1997-4868-2021-14-28-34
  3. Nurzhanov BS et al. Changes in the concentration of chemical elements in the body tissues of broilers when fed with the probiotic Bacillus Cereusand coumarin. Agrarian Science. 2022;10:53-56.
  4. Podolian YM, Chudak RA, Bolokhovsky VV, Bolokhovska VA, Blahodir AM. “Еntero-active”, supplementary feed: Patent 59058 UA. Application 10.09.2010; Date of publication 10.05.2011, Bulletin № 9.
  5. Lukashenko VS, Lysenko MA, Slepuhin VV. Probiotics improve the quality of broiler chicken meat. Poultry and Chicken Products. 2011;5:15-19.
  6. Azemraw W, Sewalem M. Review on application of probiotics in poultry production. British Journal of Poultry Sciences. 2017;6(3):46- doi: 10.5829/idosi. bjps.2017.46.52
  7. Devi ND, Nizamuddin VK, Vidyarthi VK. Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotic on the performance of broiler chicken. Livestock Research International. 2019;7(2):62-67.
  8. El-Kholy KH,  Rakha SM,  Tag El-Din HT.  Physical  performance  of  broiler  chickens affected  by  dietary  biological    Journal  of World’s Poultry Research. 2020;10(3):443-450. doi: 10.36380/jwpr.2020.51
  9. FAO, IFAD, WFP. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015. Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress. Italy, Rome: FAO; 2015: 56 p.
  10. Fedorchenko A. Probiotyky dlia broilera. [Probiotics for broiler]. Our Poultry. 2017;3:35-48. (in Ukrainian).
  11. Gilani S, Chrystal PV, Barekatain R. Current experimental models, assessment and dietary modulations of intestinal permeability in broiler chickens. Anim Nutr. 2021;7(3):801-811. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.03.001
  12. He T et al. Effects of probiotics as antibiotics substitutes on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, intestinal morphology, and barrier function of broilers. Animals. 2019;9(11):985. doi: 10.3390/ani9110985
  13. Khan S et al. The gut microbiota of laying hens and its manipulation with prebiotics and probiotics to enhance gut health and food safety. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86(13):e00600-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00600-20
  14. Korakas E et al. Dietary composition and cardiovascular risk: A mediator or a bystander? Nutrients. 2018;10(12):1912. doi: 10.3390/nu10121912
  15. Patreva LS, Shevchenko TV. Vplyv probiotyka «Baikal EM-1» na morfolohichnyi sklad tushok kachok. [Influence of probiotic "Baikal EM-1" on the morphological composition of duck carcasses]. Agricultural Science and Food Technology. Animal Feeding and Feed Technology. 2010;4(44):143-145. (in Ukrainian).
  16. Zheng A et al. Proteome changes underpin improved meat quality and yield of chickens (Gallus gallus) fed the probiotic Enterococcus faecium. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):1167. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1167
 

Information about the authors:

Roman A Tuzikov, Technician of the Department of Farm Animal Feeding and Feed Technology named after Leushin SG, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8-996-571-51-01.

Svyatoslav V Lebedev, Dr. Sci. (Biology), corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leading Researcher, Biological Tests and Examinations, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8-912-345-87-38.

Maria S Arinzhanova, 2st year postgraduate student, Junior Researcher, Department of Farm Animal Feeding and Feed Technology named after Leushin SG, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8-922-867-57-10.

Elena V Sheyda, Cand. Sci (Biology), Researcher, Biological Tests and Examinations, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8-922-862-64-02.

 

The article was submitted 14.06.2023; approved after reviewing 07.07.2023; accepted for publication 11.09.2023.

Download