Olga V Kvan, Sergey A Miroshnikov, Elena V Sheida, Elena A Sizova, Irina V Markova

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2023. Vol. 106, no 4. P. 203-215.

doi:10.33284/2658-3135-106-4-203

Original article

The effect of enterosorbents on microbial diversity of the blind intestine in broiler chickens

on a semi-synthetic diet

 

Olga V Kvan1,6, Sergey A Miroshnikov2,7, Elena V Sheida3,8, Elena A Sizova4,9, Irina V Markova5

1,2,3,4,5Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Orenburg, Russia

6,7,8,9Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russia

1,6kwan111@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0561-7002

2,7fncbst@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/orcid.org/0000-0003-1173-1952

3,8elena-shejjda@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-613X

4,9sizova.L78@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5125-5981

5irinazzz88@yandex.ru

 

Abstract. Today there is a need to obtain environmentally safe agricultural products and much attention is paid to this. The greatest interest is directed to drugs that have sorption and ion-exchange properties that can protect the intestinal mucosa from pathogenic microflora, in this regard, the introduction of enterosorbents into feed of farm animals and poultry is promising. The aim of the study was to study the effect of enterosorbents on the microbial diversity of the blind intestine in broiler chickens on a semi–synthetic diet. According to the results of the analysis of the bacterial profile of the contents of the blind intestine of broiler chickens at the end of the experiment, it was revealed that the dominant phylum are Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. The number of Rikenellaceae, Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae increased in the experimental groups, compared with the control groups. So, in the group receiving enterosgel (experimental group I) at a dosage of 6.0 g /kg of feed, genus Bacteroides (43.69%) had the largest amount of representatives, which is 2.0 and 2.1 times more than in the control groups: the group on a semi-synthetic diet (K1) and a semi-synthetic diet with a deficiency of trace elements (K2). The genus Ruminococcus was in second place in terms of rate (14.65%), which is 2.4 and 2.3 times less than in the K1 and K2 groups, respectively. In the II experimental group, representatives of the genus Bacteroides dominated (33.9%), whose number was 1.5 and 1.6 times higher than in the K1 and K2 groups, respectively, but 1.3 times lower than in the I experimental group. The number of Ruminococcus was 2 and 1.9 times lower than in group K1 and K2, respectively, but 1.2 times lower than in the first experimental group.

Keywords: broiler chickens, feeding, enterosorbents, semi-synthetic diet, microbiome, cecum.

Acknowledgments: the  work  was   supported   by  the  Russian  Science  Foundation,  Project No. 20-16-00078-П.

For citation: Kvan OV, Miroshnikov SA, Sheida EV, Sizova EA, Markova IV. The effect of enterosorbents on the microbial diversity of the blind intestine in broiler chickens on a semi-synthetic diet. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2023;106(4):203-215. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-106-4-203

 

References

  1. Egorov IA et al. Poultry diets without antobiotics. i. intestinal microbiota and performance of broiler (Gallus gallus L.) breeders fed diets with enterosorbent possessing phytobiotic and probiotic effects. Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology]. 2019;54(2):280-290. doi: 15389/agrobiology.2019.2.280eng
  2. Fisinin VI, Ushakov AS, Duskaev GK, Kazachkova NM, Nurzhanov BS, Rahmatullin ShG, Levahin GI. Mixtures of biologically active substances of oak bark extracts change immunological and productive indicators of broilers. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology]. 2018;53(2):385-392. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2018.2.385eng
  3. Notova SV, Marshinskaya OV, Kazakova TV, Miftakhova AM. Study of the influence of heavy metals and their mixtures on the body (review). Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022:105(3):19-33. https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-105-3-19
  4. Kletikova LV, Mannova MS, Yakimenko NN. The change of the intestinal microbiocenosis of chickens in the age aspect and the introduction of biologically active substances. The Agrarian Scientific Journal. 2020;10:81-86. doi:28983/asj.y2020i10pp81-86
  5. Duskaev GK, Rahmatullin ShG, Kvan OV, Nurzhanov BS, Ushakov AS, Levahin GI. Poultry productivity, blood biochemical values: the effect of Bacillus cereus and Coumarin. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2020;103(4):197-209. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-103-4-197
  6. Bailey CA, Latimer GW, Barr AC, Wigle WL, Haq AU, Balthrop JE. Efficacy of Montmorillonite Clay (NovaSil PLUS) for Protecting Full-Term Broilers from Aflatoxicosis. J Appl Poult Res. 2006;15(2):198-206. doi: 10.1093/japr/15.2.198
  7. Chen S, Guo H, Cui M, Huang R, Su R, Qi W, et al. Interaction of particles with mucosae and cell membranes. Colloids Surf B: Biointer. 2020;186:110657. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110657
  8. Chu GM, Kim JH,  Kang SN,  Song YM.  Effects  of  dietary bamboo charcoal on the carcass characteristics and meat quality of fattening pigs. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2013;33:348-355. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.3.348
  9. Ghazalah AA, Abd-Elsamee MO, Elkloub K, Moustafa M.E, Khattab MA, Rehan AA. Effect of nanosilica and bentonite as mycotoxins adsorbent agent in broiler chickens’ diet on growth performance and hepatic histopathology. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(7):2129. doi: 10.3390/ani11072129
  10. Kong L, Wang Zh, Xiao Ch, Zhu Q, Song Zh. Glycerol monolaurate ameliorated intestinal barrier and immunity in broilers by regulating intestinal inflammation, antioxidant balance, and intestinal microbiota. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;12:713485. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.713485
  11. La Reau AJ, Suen G. The Ruminococci: Key symbionts of the gut ecosystem. J Microbiol. 2018;56:199-208. doi: 10.1007/s12275-018-8024-4
  12. Man KY, et al. Use of biochar as feed supplements for animal farming. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2021;51(2):187-217. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2020.1721980
  13. Osman AI, Fawzy S, Farghali M, El-Azazy M, Elgarahy A.M, Fahim RA, Abdel Maksoud MIA, Ajlan AA, Yousry M, Saleem Y, Rooney DW. Biochar for agronomy, animal farming, anaerobic digestion, composting, water treatment, soil remediation, construction, energy storage, and carbon sequestration: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2022;20(4):2385-2485. doi: 10.1007/s10311-022-01424-x
  14. Pappas AC, Zoidis E, Theophilou N, Zervas G, Fegeros K. Effects of palygorskite on broiler performance, feed technological characteristics, and litter quality. Appl Clay Sci. 2010;49:276-280. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2010.06.003
  15. Rocha GC, Donzele JL, de Oliveira RFM, de Oliveira Silva FC, Kiefer C, Brustolini PC, Carlos Pereira CM, Alebrante L. Evaluation of zeolite levels in diets for swine in the growing and finishing phases. R. Bras. Zootec. 2012;41(1):111-117. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982012000100017
  16. Sakaridis I, Ellis RJ, Cawthraw ShA, van Vliet Arnoud HM, Stekel Dov J, Penell J, Chambers M, Ragione RM, Cook AJ. Investigating the association between the caecal microbiomes of broilers and Campylobacter burden. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:927.                             doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00927
  17. Schwaller D, Wilkens MR, Liesegang A. Zeolite A effect on calcium homeostasis in growing goats. J Anim Sci. 2016;94(4):1576-15 doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9690
  18. Shi YH, Xu ZR, Wang CZ, Sun Y. Efficacy of two different types of montmorillonite to reduce the toxicity of aflatoxin in pigs. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 2007;50(4):473-478. doi: 10.1080/00288230709510315
  19. Thompson JN, Scott ML. The role of selenium in the nutrition of the chick. Journal Nutrition. 1969;97(3):335-342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/97.3.335
  20. Toprak NN, Yilmaz A, Öztürk E, Yigit O, Cedden F. Effect of micronized zeolite addition to lamb concentrate feeds on growth performance and some blood chemistry and metabolites. South Afr J Animal Sci. 2016;46(3):313-320. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v46i3.11
  21. The European Union explained. How the European Union works. Your guide to the EU institutions. The  European  Commission:  promoting the common interest. Directorate-General for Communication (European Commission). Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union; 2014:19-22. doi: 2775/11255
  22. Wilkinson N, Hughes RJ, Aspden WJ, Chapman J, Moore RJ, Stanley D. The gastrointestinal tract microbiota of the Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2016;100(9):4201-4209. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7280-z
  23. Wu QJ, Zhou YM, Wu YN, Zhang LL, Wang T. The effects of natural and modified clinoptilolite on intestinal barrier function and immune response to LPS in broiler chickens. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013;153(1-2):70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.02.006
  24. Xia MS, Hu CH, Xu ZR. Effects of copper-bearing montmorillonite on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities, and intestinal microflora and morphology of male broilers. Poult Sci. 2004;83(11):1868- doi: 10.1093/ps/83.11.1868
  25. Yan W, Sun C,  Yuan J,  Yang N.  Gut  metagenomic  analysis  reveals  prominent roles  of  Lactobacillus  and  cecal  microbiota  in  chicken  feed efficiency. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1-11. doi: 10.1038/srep45308
 

Information about the authors:

Olga V Kvan, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Senior Researcher, Acting Head of the Department of Feeding Farm Animals and Feed Technology named after prof. S.G. Leushin, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, January 9, 29; Senior Researcher at the Institute of Bioelementology Orenburg State University, 13 Pobedy Ave, Orenburg, 460018; tel.: 8-922-548-56-57.

Sergey A Miroshnikov, Dr. Sci. (Biology), RAS Corresponding Member, Chief Researcher of the Department of Feeding for Farm Animals and Feed Technology named after Leushin SG, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 9 Yanvarya St., 29, Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8(3532)30-81-70; Rector, Orenburg State University, 13 Pobedy Ave, Orenburg, 460018, tel.: 77-67-70.

Elena V Sheida, Cand. Sci. (Biology), researcher at the laboratory of Biological Tests and Examinations, Federal Research Centre for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, January 9, 29; Senior Researcher at the Institute of Bioelementology, Orenburg State University, pr. Pobedy, 13, Orenburg, 460018; Senior Researcher at the Institute of Bioelementology, Orenburg State University, 13 Pobedy Ave, Orenburg, 460018, , tel: 8-922-862-64-02.

Elena A Sizova, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Head of the Centre "Nanotechnologies in Agriculture", Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29, 9 January St., Orenburg, 460000; Professor of the scientific and educational center "Biological systems and nanotechnologies, Orenburg State University, 13, Pobedy Ave., Orenburg, 460018, cell.: 8-912-344-99-07.

Irina V Markova, Cand. Sci (Biology), Head of Scientific and Educational Center, Researcher, Department of Technology for Beef Cattle Breeding and Beef Production, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29, 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, сell.: 8-961-047-40-26.

 

The article was submitted 14.11.2023; approved after reviewing 21.11.2023; accepted for publication 11.12.2023.

Download