Valery N Kuvshinov, Vasily M Duborezov, Elena Y Tsis

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2024. Vol. 107, no 1. Р. 83-92.

 

doi:10.33284/2658-3135-107-1-83

 

Original artiсle

Productivity and milk quality after feeding high-yielding cows with chlorella suspension

 

Valery N Kuvshinov1, Vasily M Duborezov2, Elena Y Tsis3

1,2,3 Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member LK Ernst,  Dubrovitsy, Russia

1vnkuvshinov@yandex.ru 2korma10@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-6739 3tsis-elen@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1988-1189  

Abstract. The paper presents the results of the experiment conducted in Moscow region on high-yielding cows of Black Spotted Holstein breed on feeding prebiotic feed additive "Chlorella Suspension". The animals, formed according to the principle of pair analogues with 12 heads in each, were kept in tie stalls in the second-third month after calving. In addition to the main diet consisting of silage, haylage, hay, beer pellets and concentrates, the cows of the experimental group were additionally fed with a supplement based on microscopic algae in the amount of one liter per head per day for 120 days. As a result of the experiment it was found that cows of the control group, which did not receive the supplement, the average daily milk yield for the period of the experiment decreased from 35.71 kg to 26.58 kg or by 25.6%, and in cows of the experimental group - from 36.54 kg to 30.75 kg or by 15.8%. The difference in average daily milk yield for the whole period of research amounted to 3.85 kg of milk. The experimental group also showed higher indicators of fat-milk and protein-milk productivity. From each cow during the period of experiment, an average of 148.19 kg of milk fat and 131.02 kg of protein were obtained from each cow, which is 13.94 kg and 10.64 kg more than in the control group, respectively.

Keywords: cows, prebiotic feed additive, chlorella suspension, average daily milk yield, fat-milk productivity, protein-milk productivity

Acknowledgments: the work was carried out with the help and support of the management and specialists of PZ "Naro-Osanovsky". We express our gratitude to the general director Alexander Nikolaevich Rychlik, specialists of zootechnical service Oleg Mikhailovich Tsurtsilin and Irina Mikhailovna Sitnikova.

For сitation: Kuvshinov VN, Duborezov VM, Tsis EYu. Productivity and milk quality after feeding high-yielding cows with chlorella suspension. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2024;107(1):83-92. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-107-1-83

 

References

 
  1. Kislova DA, Duskaev GK, Kvan OV, Sheida EV. The influence of feeding systems, biologically active substances and non-traditional feeds on digestibility and physiology of digestion in goats (review). Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022;105(4):131-145. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-131
  2. Golovin AV, Rykov RA.  Influence  of  energy  supply  of  diet  of  cows  on  dairy productivity  and  biochemical blood status. Veterinary, zootechnics and biotechnology. 2021;3:71-77. doi: 10.36871/vet.zoo.bio.202103010
  3. Gorelik OV, Fedoseeva NA, Knysh IV. Milk productivity of cows of Black Spotted lines of the Holstein cattle. Izvestia Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University. 2019;56:99-105. doi:10.24411/2078-1318-2019-13099
  4. Duborezov V, Tsis E, Vaulin E. Prebiotic supplement based on microscopic algae in the diet of first calvers. Compound Feeds. 2023;6:46-48. doi: 25741/2413-287X-2023-06-4-202
  5. Duborezov VM. Dairy cow feeding and nutrition according to detailed nutrition requirements. Journal Dairy and Beef Cattle Breeding. 2020;4:52-54. doi: 33943/MMS.2020.19.15.009
  6. Nekrasov RV, Chabaev MG, Tsis EYu, Karetkin BA, Tereshkova EA, Myagkih FF. The use of bifid-containing feed probiotic additive in the feeding of young cattle. Journal Dairy and Beef Cattle Breeding. 2021;3:3-8. doi: 33943/MMS.2021.10.78.001
  7. Kirnos IO, Suslova IV, Duborezov VM. Adapting feed system - the key factor in realization the genetic potential of cows productivity. 2011;9:9-11.
  8. Nekrasova RV, Golovina AV, Mahaeva EA, editors. Standards requirements of dairy cattle and pigs in nutrients: monograph. Moscow: RAS; 2018:290 p.
  9. Ovchinnikov AA, Ovchinnikova LYu, Matrosova JuV. Incubation qualities of chicken-bird eggs of parent stock using probiotics in the diet. Bulletin of the Kurgan State Agricultural Academy. 2019;4(32):35-38.
  10. Popov VS, Svazlian GA,  Vorobyeva NV.  Prospects  for  the  use  of  biologically active  additives  based  on  Chlorella vulgaris. Veterinary science and feeding. 2020;7:53-55. doi: 10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2020-7-13
  11. Ryazantsev MV, Duborezov VM. The effect of the feeding level on productivity and service period of dairy cows. Compound Feeds. 2021;6:70-72. https://doi.org/10.25741/2413-287X-2021-06-3-141
  12. Mungin VV, Gibalkina NI, Akimov DS, Ryabov IA, Morozowa NK. Chlorella in the nutrition of calves of the preweaning period. Dagestan GAU Proceedings. 2023;2(18):101-104. doi: 52671/26867591.2023.2.101
  13. Strebkova KA, Abilov BT, Artamonov VS. The use of "Chlorella" feed additive in the diets  of  dairy  cows  and unweaned calves. Agricultural Journal. 2020;5(13):64-73. doi: 10.25930/2687-1254/011.5.13.2020
  14. Laptev GYu, Yildirim EA, Dunyashev TP, Ilina LA, Tyurina DG, Filippova VA, Brazhnik EA, Tarlavin NV, Dubrovin AV, Novikova NI. Peculiarities of taxonomic and functional characteristics of rumen microbiota of dairy cows suffered from ketosis. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology]. 2021;56(2):356-373. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2021.2.356eng
  15. Frolova M, Slozhenkina M, Mosolov A. Micro seaweeds - a natural biogrowth factor. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii. 2021;9:55-56. doi: 25701/ZZR.2021.31.46.010
  16. Tsis EYu, Duborezov VM, Rykov RA. The effect of different feeding levels on the productivity and metabolism of dairy cows. Zootechniya. 2023;5:2-4.  doi: 25708/ZT.2023.17.95.001
  17. Shatskikh EV, Shevkunov OA. Probiotic preparation "Prostor" in feeding chickens-broiler. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2019;2(181):36-41. doi: 32417/article_5cb0b02e77c954.66179326
  18. Duskaev GK, Levakhin GI, Korolyov VL, Sirazetdinov FKh. Use of probiotics and plant extracts to improve the productivity of ruminants (review). Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2019;102(1):136-148. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-102-1-136
  19. Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Global Rumen Census Collaborators, Janssen PH. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(1):14567. doi: 10.1038/srep14567
  20. Kharitonov Е The processes of nutrition and metabolism affecting the biosynthesis of milk components and vitality of cows with high- and low-fat milk. Animals. 2022;12(5):604. doi: 10.3390/ani12050604
  21.  Lamminen M,  Halmemies-Beauchet-Filleau  A,  Kokkonen T, Simpura I, Jaakkola S, Vanhatalo A.  Comparison  of  microalgae  and  rapeseed  meal  as  supplementary  protein  in  the  grass silage   based   nutrition  of  dairy    Animal  Feed  Science  аnd  Technology. 2017;234:295-311. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.10.002
  22. Tsiplakou E,  Abdullah MAM,  Mavrommatis A, Chatzikonstantinou M, Skliros D, Sotirakoglou K, Flemetakis E, Zervas G. The effect of dietary Chlorella vulgaris inclusion on goat's milk chemical composition, fatty acids profile and enzymes activities related to oxidation.  Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2018;102(1):142-151. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12671
 

Information about the authors

Valeriy N Kuvshinov, Co-researcher of the Department of Feeding of Farm Animals, Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member LK Ernst, 60 Dubrovitsy, Podolsk district, Moscow region, 142132, tel.: 8 496 765-12-43.

Vasily M Duborezov, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Professor, Chief Researcher of the Department of Feeding  of  Farm  Animals,   Federal   Research  Center  for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member LK Ernst, 60 Dubrovitsy, Podolsk district, Moscow region, 142132, tel.: 8 496765-12-43.

Elena Y Tsis, Researcher of the Department of Feeding of Farm Animals, Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academy Member LK Ernst, 60 Dubrovitsy, Podolsk district, Moscow region, 142132, tel.: 8 496 765-12-97.

The article was submitted 10.01.2024; approved after reviewing 06.02.2024; accepted for publication 18.03.2024.

Download