Bogolyubova NV, Kolesnik NS, Lakhonin PD, Elatkin NP, Nikolaev AA.

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2024. Vol. 107, no 4. Р. 120-132.

 

doi:10.33284/2658-3135-107-4-120

 

Original article

The relationship of some indicators of composition and quality of meat of the Angus bulls

 

Nadezhda V Bogolyubova1, Nikita S Kolesnik2, Pavel D Lakhonin3, Nikolai P Elatkin4,

Alexander A Nikolaev5

1,2,3,5Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry - VIZh named after Academician L.K. Ernst, Moscow region, Dubrovitsy, Russia

4Miratorg-Genetics LLC, Moscow, Russia

1652202@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-7022

2kominisiko@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4267-5300

3Lakhonin.99@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7354-0337

4n.elatkin@agrohold.ru

5alexandralces@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9355-3285

 

Abstract. The study of the formation of the composition and quality of livestock products is of scientific and practical importance. In this regard, the aim of the research was to determine the biological markers characterizing the quality indicators of muscle tissue of the Angus cattle. The object of the study was muscle samples of the rib eye of the Angus bulls (n = 157). The indicators of chemical, mineral, amino acid composition, quality indicators of meat were determined and correlations between them were calculated. pH 24 positively correlated with the content of chromium in meat. Positive correlations of water-holding capacity of meat (WHC) with the content of moisture, protein, ash, calcium, phosphorus, chromium, phenylalanine and negative ones with the content of fat and arginine were noted. Total amount of water-soluble antioxidants (TAWSA) positively correlates with the content of moisture, ash, macro- and microelements, cysteine, proline and negatively with the content of fat and some amino acids. The obtained results allow us to draw a conclusion about the formation of quality indicators of raw materials, which will help in developing methods for regulating and intravital formation of high-quality products of domestic cattle breeding.

Keywords: bulls, Angus breed, chemical, amino acid composition, meat quality, correlations

Acknowledgments: the work was performed in accordance to the plan of research works for 2022-2024 L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center Directorate (No. FGGN-2022-0011).  

For citation: Bogolyubova NV, Kolesnik NS, Lakhonin PD, Elatkin NP, Nikolaev AA. The relationship of some indicators of composition and quality of meat of the Angus bulls. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2024;107(4):120-132. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-107-4-120

 

References

 
  1. Alekseeva EI, Sukhanova SF. The quality of meat obtained from animals of the Gereford and Aberdin-angus breeds. Innovations and food security. 2017;4:20-25.
  2. Alekseeva EI, Leshchuk TL, Lushnikov NA, Kostomakhin NM. Amino acid composition of beef obtained from cattle of beef breeds. Chief Zootechnician. 2022;8(229):3-10. doi: 10.33920/sel-03-2208-01
  3. Savina AA, et al. Amperometric detection of antioxidant activity of model and biological fluids. Moscow University Chemistry Bulletin. 2020;61(6):429-437.
  4. Arutyunyants AA, Lokhov RE, Salamova NA. The study of antioxidant activity of amino acids. Bashkir Chemical Journal. 2012;19(1):169-171.
  5. Borodina OV, Shmat EV. Prospects for the production of new generation food products: (Conference proceedings) Proc. of the All-Russian scientific and practical conf., (Omsk, April 13-14, 2017). Omsk: OGAU named after P.A. Stolypin; 2017:524-526.
  6. Otarov AI et al. The influence of different keeping technologies on meat quality indicators of purebred and crossbred bulls. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production.2023;106(2):52-62. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-106-2-52
  7. Gorlov NF, Tikhonov SL, Tikhonova NV. The quality of the meat from an uncharacteristic course of autolysis and stress. Food Industry. 2016;1(1):44-53.
  8. State Standard 33319-2015. Meat and meat products. Method for determining the mass fraction of moisture. Implementation date 2016-07-01. Moscow: Standartinform; 2018:9.
  9. State Standard 23042-2015. Meat and meat products. Methods for determining fat. Implementation date 2017-01-01. M.: Standartinform; 2016:11.
  10. State Standard 31727-2012. Meat and meat products. Method determination of the mass fraction of total ash. Implementation date 2013-07-01. Moscow: Standartinform; 2013:12.
  11. State Standard R 55573-2013 Meat and meat products. Determination of calcium by atomic absorption and titrimetric methods. Implementation date 2015-01-01. Мoscow: Standartinform; 2014:12.
  12. State Standard 9794-2015. Meat products. Methods for determining the content of total phosphorus. Implementation date 2017-01-01. Мoscow: Standartinform; 2019:12.
  13. State Standard 33424-2015. Meat and meat products. Determination of magnesium by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Implementation date 2016-07-01. Мoscow: Standartinform; 2016:11.
  14. Dzhulamanov KM, Makaev ShA, Gerasimov NP. Influence of bull genotypes by genes CAPN1, CAST and TG5 on amino acid and fatty acid compositions of meat in descendants of the Kazakh white-headed breed. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2020;103( 4):74-84. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-103-4-74
  15. Kozlikin AV, et al. Dynamics of chemical composition and technological properties of meats. Russian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 2019;2(68):80-85.
  16. Belous AA, et al. Identification of genes associated with color characteristics of meat and fat tissue of aberdeen-angus cattle. Agrarian science. 2024;6:68-76. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2024-383-6-68-76
  17. Kabanov VD, et al. Change in amino acids compositions of beef with concentrated fattening of cattle. Vestnik of the Russian Agricultural Science. 2019;3:63-67. doi: 10.30850/vrsn/2019/3/63-67
  18. Vostrikova NL, et al. Investigations of proteins' usefulness in the different types of beef's muscles. All About Meat. 2013;2:34-38.
  19. Kalyuzhnaya TV, Orlova DA, Karpenko LYu. Dependence of the nutritional value of meat on the quality category. International Bulletin of Veterinary Science. 2023;2:156-160. doi: 10.52419/issn2072-2419.2023.2.156
  20. Kudryashov LS. Ageing and salting of meat. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuizdat; 1992:206 p.
  21. Kudryashov LS, Kudryashova OA. Effect of animal stress on meat quality. Meat Industry. 2012;1:8-11.
  22. Lebedeva SN, Zhamsaranova SD. The assessment of antioxidant potential of meat products. Bulletin of the East Siberian State University of Technology and Management. 2016;3(60):39-45.
  23. Semenova AA, et al. Effect of adaptogens on muscle tissue microstructure of hybrid pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus ) during intensive fattening. Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology]. 2023;58(2):355-372. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2023.2.355eng
  24. Frolov AN et al. Assessment of the productive qualities and elemental status of bulls. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022; 105(1):62-73. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-105-1-62
  25. Abou-Kassem DE, et al. Influences of total sulfur amino acids and photoperiod on growth, carcass traits, blood parameters, meat quality and cecal microbial load of broilers. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2022;29(3):1683-1693. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.10.063
  26. Abubakar AA, et al. Effects of stocking and transport conditions on physicochemical properties of meat and acute-phase proteins in cattle. Foods. 2021;10(2):252. doi: 10.3390/foods10020252
  27. Bi YZ, et al. High freezing rate improves flavor fidelity effect of hand grab mutton after short-term frozen storage. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2022;9:959824. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.959824
  28. Dong F, et al. Fusion of spectra and texture features of hyperspectral imaging for quantification and visualization of characteristic amino acid contents in beef. LWT. 2024;206:116576. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116576
  29. Jiang S, et al. Characterization of stewed beef by sensory evaluation and multiple intelligent sensory technologies combined with chemometrics methods. Food Chemistry. 2023;408:135193. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135193
  30. Karau A, Grayson I. Amino acids in human and animal nutrition. In: Zorn H, Czermak P (editors). Biotechnology of food and feed additives. 2014;143:189-228. doi: 10.1007/10_2014_269
  31. Matarneh SK, Silva SL, Gerrard DE. New insights in muscle biology that alter meat quality. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. 2021;9(1):355-377. doi: 1146/annurev-animal-021419-083902
  32. Pal Choudhuri S, Delay RJ, Delay ER. L-amino acids elicit diverse response patterns in taste sensory cells: a role for multiple receptors. PLoS One. 2015;10(6): doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130088
  33. Salami SA, et al. Fatty acid composition, shelf-life and eating quality of beef from steers fed corn or wheat dried distillers' grains with solubles in a concentrate supplement to grass silage. Meat Science. 2021;173:108381. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108381
  34. Zhang Y, et al. Effects of protein grass hay as alternative feed resource on lamb's fattening performance and meat quality. Meat Science. 2024;218:109644. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109644
 

Information about the authors:

Nadezhda V Bogolyubova, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Leading Researcher, Head of the Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Farm Animals, Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry – VIJ named after Academician L.K. Ernst, 60 Dubrovitsy Podolsk Municipal District, 142132, Moscow Region, cell.  8-915-320-24-39.

Nikita S Kolesnik, Junior Researcher at the Laboratory of Fundamental Principles of Nutrition of farm animals and Fish, Federal Research Center of Animal Husbandry – VIJ named after Academician L.K. Ernst, 60 Dubrovitsy Podolsk Municipal District, 142132, Moscow Region, cell. 8-915-320-24-39.

Pavel D Lakhonin, Junior Researcher at the Laboratory of Fundamental Principles of Nutrition of farm Animals and Fish, Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry – VIZ named after Academician L.K. Ernst, 60 Dubrovitsy Podolsk Municipal District, 142132, Moscow Region, cell. 8-915-320-24-39.

Nikolai P Elatkin, Cand. Sci. (Biology),  General  Director  of Miratorg-Genetics LLC, Moscow, Nobelya St. (Skolkovo Innovation Centre ter), 5 building, 121205, cell. 8-915-320-24-39.

Alexander A Nikolaev, post-graduate student, Junior researcher at the Laboratory of DNA Technologies in Animal Husbandry, Federal Research Center of Animal Husbandry named after Academician L.K. Ernst, 60 Dubrovitsy Podolsk Municipal District, 142132, Moscow Region, cell. 8-915-320-24-39.

 

The article was submitted 28.10.2024; approved after reviewing 08.11.2024; accepted for publication 16.12.2024.

Download