Duskaev GК, Kazachkova NM, Ushakov AS, Nurzhanov BS, Rysayev AF, Rakhmatullin ShG, Ryabov NI.

DOI: 10.33284/2658-3135-102-2-125

UDC 636.5:577

Acknowledgements:

Research was carried out supported by Russian Scientific Foundation (project 16-16-10048)

Changes in the productive qualities of broiler chickensagainst the background

of enzyme-containing diet and Quercus cortex extract

G К Duskaev1, N M Kazachkova1, A SU shakov2, B S Nurzhanov1, A F Rysayev1, Sh G Rakhmatullin1, N I Ryabov1

1 Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Orenburg, Russia)

2Federal Scientific Center «All-Russian Research and Technological Institute of Poultry of the Russian Academy of Sciences»(Moscow region, Sergiev Posad)

Summary. The use of antibiotics in poultry production is prohibited both in the European Union and in the countries wishing to export to the EU. The growing consumer demand for healthy products around the world turns phytobiotics into the best alternative, effective, reliable and affordable.

In addition, it is known that metabolites of medicinal plants are inhibitors of Quorum Sensing system in bacteria. In this connection, the purpose of the research was to study the effect of Quercus cortex extract at the optimal dose on the productivity and condition of body of healthy broiler chickens.

For the experiment, we selected 120 heads of 7-day healthy broiler chickens, divided into 4 groups using the analog method.

The control group – basic diet (BD); I experimental group – BD+Quercus cortex extract (2.5 ml/kg live weight); II experimental group – BD+Quercus cortex extract (2.5 ml/ kg live weight)+enzyme preparation: glucoamylase – not less than 1000 units/g and xylanase –up to 600 units/g (5 g/10 kg of feed); III experimental group – OR+enzyme preparation: glucoamylase – not less than 1000 units/g and xylanase –up to 600 units/g (5 g/10 kg of feed).

In the course of the research, an increase in the palatability of feed in the groups over the entire period of the experiment was found to be 2.6-15.4%, the increase in live weight of broiler chickens – by 3.1-16.6% and a decrease in feed consumption per 1 kg of live weight (by 3.7-9.2%). There was an increase in the concentration of iron in broiler chickens I and II experimental groups in the blood (7.8-11.8%), in the liver (23.7-92.4 %; P≤0.05), in the spleen (53.9-77.7%; P≤0.05) against the background of a decrease in muscle tissue. Thus, the inclusion of Quercus cortex extract («antiquorum» substances detected) in the enzyme-containing ration increases the productivity of poultry.

Key words: broiler chickens, feeding, Quercus cortex, enzyme preparation: glucoamylase and xylanase, poultry productivity, palatability of food, live weight, blood.

References

  1. Bagirov VA, Duskaev GK, Kazachkova NM, Rakhmatullin ShG, Yausheva EV, Kosyan DB, Makaev ShA, Dusaeva KhB. Addition of Quercus cortex extract to broiler diet changes slaughter indicators and biochemical composition of muscle tissue. AgriculturalBiology.2018;53(4):799-810. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2018.4.799eng
  2. Fisinin VI, Ushakov AS, Duskaev GK, Kazachkova NM, Nurzhanov BS, Rakhmatullin ShG, Levakhin GI. Mixtures of biologically active substances of oak bark extracts change immunological and productive indicators of broilers. Agricultural Biology. 2018;53(2):385-392. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2018.2.385eng
  3. Maznev N. Encyclopedia of medicinal plants. 3rd ed., Corr. and add. Moscow: Martin; 2004.
  4. 32-33.
  5. Abreu AC, McBain AJ, Simões M. Plants as sources of new antimicrobials and resistance-modifying agents. Natural Product Reports. 2012;29(9):1007-1021. doi: 10.1039/c2np20035j
  6. Allen HK, Levine UY, Looft T, Bandrick M, Casey TA. Treatment, promotion, commotion: antibiotic alternatives in food-producing animals. Trends in Microbiology. 2013;21(3):114-119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2012.11.001
  7. Bedford MR, Cowieson AJ. Exogenous enzymes and their effects on intestinal microbiology. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2012;173(1-2):76-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.018
  8. Blaiotta G, La Gatta B, Di Capua M, Di Luccia A, Coppola R, Aponte M. Effect of chestnut extract and chestnut fiber on viability of potential probiotic Lactobacillus strains under gastrointestinal tract conditions. Food Microbiology. 2013;36(2):161-169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.05.002
  9. Chung K-T, Lu Z, Chou MW. Mechanism of inhibition of tannic acid and related compounds on the growth of intestinal bacteria. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 1998;36(12):1053-1060. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(98)00086-6
  10. Diarra MS, Silversides FG, Diarrassouba F, Pritchard J, Masson L, Brousseau R, Bonnet C, Delaquis P, Bach S, Skura B, Topp E. Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus сouts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escherichia coli Isolates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73(20):6566-6576. doi: doi:10.1128/AEM.01086-07
  11. Geisen R. Inhibition of food-related pathogenic bacteria by god-transformed Penicillium nalgiovense strains. Journal of Food Protection. 1999;62:940-943.
  12. Hashemi SR, Davoodi H. Herbal plants and their derivatives as growth and health promoters in animal nutrition. Veterinary Research Communications. 2011;35(3):169-180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-010-9458-2
  13. Hashemi SR, Davoodi H. Phytogenics as new class of feed additive in poultry industry. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2010;9(17):2295-2304. doi: 10.3923/javaa.2010.2295.2304
  14. Hee DB, McAllister TA, Yanke J, Cheng KJ, Muir AD. Effects of condensed tannins on endoglucanase activity and filter paper digestion by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1993;59(7):2132-2138.
  15. Horn NL, Ruch F, Miller G, Ajuwon KM, Adeola O. Determination of the adequate dose of garlic diallyl disulfide and diallyl trisulfide for effecting changes in growth performance, total-tract nutrient and energy digestibility, ileal characteristics, and serum immune parameters in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2016;95(10):2360-2365. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew126
  16. Huyghebaert G, Ducatelle R, Immerseel Van F. An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers. The Veterinary Journal. 2011;187(2):182-188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.03.003
  17. Kamboh AA, Zhu WY. Individual and combined effects of genistein and hesperidin on immunity and intestinal morphometry in lipopolysacharide-challenged broiler chickens. Poultry Science;2014;93(9):2175-2183. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-03971
  18. Liu D, Guo S, Guo Y. Xylanase supplementation to a wheat-based diet alleviated the intestinal mucosal barrier impairment of broiler chickens challenged by Clostridium perfringens. Avian Pathol. 2012;41(3):291-298.
  19. Mansoori B, Rogiewicz A, Slominski BA. The effect of canola meal tannins on the intestinal absorption capacity of broilers using a D-xylose test. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2015;99(6):1084-1093. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12320
  20. Mila I, Scalbert A, Expert D. Iron withholding by plant polyphenols and resistance to pathogens and rots. Phytochemistry. 1996;42(6):1551-1555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(96)00174-4
  21. Phytogenics in Animal Nutrition: Natural Concepts to Optimize Gut Health and Performance. Steiner T, editor. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 2009:192 p.
  22. Redondo LM, Chacana PA, Dominguez JE, Fernandez Miyakawa ME. Perspectives in the use of tannins as alternative to antimicrobial growth promoter factors in poultry. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5:article 118.
  23. Redondo LM, Redondo EA, Delgado F, La Sala L, Pereyra A, Garbaccio S, et al. Control of Clostridium perfringens necrotic enteritis by tannins added to the diet. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Molecular Biology and Pathogenesis of the Clostridia (ClostPath 8). Palm Cove. Australia. 2013;5.
  24. Schiavone A, Guo K, Tassone S, Gasco L, Hernandez E, Denti R, Zaccarato I. Effects of a natural extract of chestnut wood on digestibility, performance traits, and nitrogen balance of broiler chicks. Poultry Science. 2008;87(3):521-527. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00113
  25. Simões M, Bennett RN, Rosa EAS. Understanding antimicrobial activities of phytochemicals against multidrug resistant bacteria and biofilms. Natural Product Reports. 2009;26(6):746-757. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/B821648G
  26. Starčević K, Krstulović L, Brozić D, Maurić M, Stojević Z, Mikulec Ž, Bajić M, Mašek T. Production performance, meat composition and oxidative susceptibility in broiler chicken fed with different phenolic compounds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2014;95(6):1172-1178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6805
  27. Tosi G, Massi P, Antongiovanni M, Buccioni A, Minieri S, Marenchino L, Mele M. Efficacy test of a hydrolysable tannin extract against necrotic enteritis in challenged broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2013;12(3):e62: 392-395. doi: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e62
  28. Windisch W, Schedle K, Plitzner C, Kroismayr A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. Journal of Animal Science. 2008;86(E Suppl):E140-E148. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0459
  29. Yang C, Chowdhury MAK, Huo Y, Gong J. Phytogenic compounds as alternatives to in-feed antibiotics: potentials and challenges in application. Pathogens. 2015;4(1):137-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4010137

    Duskaev Galimzhan Kalikhanovich, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Deputy Director For Science, Head of Department of Agricultural Animals Nutrition and Fodder Technology named after S.G. Leushin, Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Januarya St., tel.: 8(3532)43-46-79, e-mail: gduskaev@mail.ru

    Kazachkova Nadezhda Mikhaylovna, Cand. Sci. (Biol.),Researcher, Department of Agricultural Animals Nutrition and Fodder Technology named after S.G. Leushin, Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Januarya St.

    Ushakov Alexander Sergeyevich, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Interim Director, Federal Scientific Center «All-Russian Research and Technological Institute of Poultry of the Russian Academy of Sciences», 141311, Московскаяобл., г. СергиевПосад, ул. Птицеградская, 10, e-mail: asu2004@bk.ru

    Nurzhanov Baer Serekpaevich, Cand. Sci. (Agr.),SeniorResearcher, Department of Agricultural Animals Nutrition and Fodder Technology named after S.G. Leushin, Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Januarya St., e-mail: baer.nurzhanov@mail.ru

    Rysayev Albert Farkhitdinovich, Cand. Sci. (Biol.),Researcher,Department of Agricultural Animals Nutrition and Fodder Technology named after S.G. Leushin, Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Januarya St.

    Rakhmatullin Shamil Gafiullovich, Cand. Sci. (Biol.),SeniorResearcher,Department of Agricultural Animals Nutrition and Fodder Technology named after S.G. Leushin, Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Januarya St., e-mail: shahm2005@rambler.ru

    Ryabov Nikolai Ivanovich, Dr. Sci. (Agr.),Leading Researcher, Department for Beef Cattle Technology and Beef Production, Federal Research Center for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 460000, Orenburg, Russia, 29, 9 Januarya St.,тел.: 8(3532)43-46-78

Received: 3 June 2019; Accepted: 17 June 2019; Published: 28 June 2019

Download