Amash I Otarov, Foat G Kayumov, Ruziya F Tretiyakova, Murat B Ulimbashev

Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2023. Vol. 106, no 2. Р. 52-62.

 

doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-106-2-52

   

Original article

The influence of different keeping technologies on meat quality indicators of purebred and

crossbred bulls

 

Amash I Otarov1, Foat G Kayumov2, Ruziya F Tretiyakova3, Murat B Ulimbashev4

1Institute of Agriculture – branch of Federal State Budgetary Research Institution «Federal Research Centre «Kabardino-Balkarian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences», Nalchik, Russia

2,3Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Orenburg, Russia

4North Caucasus Federal Agrarian Research Centre, Mikhailovsk, Russia

1kbniish2007@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3443-714Х

2nazkalms@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-9228

3kserev_1976@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5155-4295

4murat-ul@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9344-5751

 

Abstract. The purpose of the research is to study the quality indicators of the meat of bulls of different genotypes, depending on the technology of their rearing in the post-embryonic period. The first control group included bulls of the Red Steppe breed, the second – crossbreeds of the first generation after crossing of the Red Steppe cattle with bulls of the Hereford breed, grown according to the technology of dairy cattle breeding adopted by the farm. The first and second experimental groups were formed from the same-named peers of the control groups, reared by the technology of beef cattle breeding. It was found that the dry matter content in meat from half-blooded bulls, regardless of the beef production technology, was higher than in products obtained from purebred peers by 2,09–2,31 abs.%, and in fat concentration - by 1,87-2,07 abs.%. The tendency of superiority in content in meat obtained from half-blooded animals were also observed for protein and ash. Different cultivation technologies did not have a noticeable effect on the chemical composition of the meat of the experimental groups of bulls, which characterizes, practically, equal quality indicators of the average sample of minced meat. The protein-quality index in the average meat sample and the longest back muscle of the crossbreeds was higher, regardless of the rearing technology, than in the Red Steppe bulls by an average of 0,07-0,15 units and 0,33-0,43 units, respectively. In young animals of different origin, grown according to the beef production technology adopted in beef cattle breeding, the biological usefulness of the meat products obtained is significantly higher than in the control groups of the same name peers.

Keywords: bulls, Red Steppe breed, Hereford breed, crossing, keeping technologies, meat quality, biological usefulness

For citation: Otarov AI, Kayumov FG, Tretiyakova RF, Ulimbashev MB. The influence of different keeping technologies on meat quality indicators of purebred and crossbred bulls. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2023;106(2):52-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33284/2658-3135-106-2-52.

 

References

 
  1. Basonov OA, Asadchiy AA. Meat productivity and biological characteristics of purebred and crossbreed bulls of the Hereford breed. Zootechny. 2020;10:20-24. doi: 10.25708/ZT.2020.29.67.006
  2. Bakharev AA, Fomintsev KA, Grigoriev KN. Industrial crossbreeding of beef cattle in the Northern Urals. Izvestya of Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University. 2018;53:129-133. doi: 10.24411/2078-1318-2018-14129
  3. Kosilov VI, Kharlamov AV, Babicheva IA, Rakhimzhanova IA, Tretyakova RF, Kayumov FG. Biological value, physical and chemical properties of muscle tissue of purebred and crossbred bulls. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2022а;105(4):79-88. doi:10.33284/2658-3135-105-4-79
  4. Kosilov VI, Nikonova EA, Gubaidullin NM, Mironova IV, Rebezov MB, Salikhov AA, Baranovich ES. The influence of two-three-breed crossing on the quality of meat products of steers. Michurinsky Agronomic Bulletin. 2021;1:42-47.
  5. Maksimchuk MG, Levina GN, Zelepukina MV, Artyukh VM. Live weight and slaughter qualities of bulls of different black and variegated genotypes reared at the feedlot in winter. Dairy and Beef Cattle Farming. 2022;5:17-21. doi: 10.33943/MMS.2022.91.98.004
  6. Inerbaev BO, Khramtsova IA, Inerbaeva AT. Commercial cross breeding of dairy cattle with beef bulls in Western Siberia. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2021;51(3):75-81. doi: 10.26898/0370-8799-2021-3-8
  7. Prokhorov IP, Kalmykova OA, Lukyanov VN, Shoshina YuV. The intensity of fat accumulation and its distribution in the body of young cattle. Head of Animal Breeding. 2022;12(233):3-11. doi: 10.33920/sel-03-2212-01
  8. Ubushaev BS, Natyrov AK, Arylov YuN, Moroz NN, Slizskaya SA. Qualitative indicators of beef productivity of cattle rearing crossbreeds of different genotypes. Development Problems of Regional Agro-industrial Complex. 2021;4(48):162-168. doi: 10.52671/20790996_2021_4_162
  9. Kosilov VI, Rakhimzhanova IA, Rebezov MB, Mironova IV, Sedyh TA, Bykova OA. The quality of meat products of bulls of different breeds at intensive rearing. Izvestia of Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2022b;2(94):262-266. doi: 10.37670/2073-0853-2022-94-2-262-266
  10. Kodzokova ZL, Ulimbashev MB. Payment for feed and age-related changes in the growth rates of Simmental young animals with different growing technologies (Conference proceedings) Problems of animal husbandry and fodder production in Russia: coll. scientific works. Based on the materials of the sixth All-Russia. scientific-practical. conf. (Tver, February 11-13, 2015). Tver; 2015:109-111.
  11. Kostomakhin NM, Safronov SL. Growth and development of purebred young cattle of Black Spotted breed and crossbreds with the Hereford breed. Head of Animal Breeding. 2020;12(209):3-15. doi: 10.33920/sel-03-2012-01
  12. Nikonova EA. Slaughter parameters and carcasses quality of purebred young stock of the Black Spotted breed and its two-three breed crosses with the Holstein, Simmental and Limousine cattle. Vestnik of Buryat State Academy of Agriculture named after V. Philippov. 2020;4(61):75-82. doi: 10.34655/bgsha.2020.61.4.012
  13. Nikonova EA, Yuldashbaev YuA, Kosilov VI, Savchuk SV. Peculiarities of nutrient metabolism in the body of a purebreed and mixed young cattle. Agrarian Science. 2022;5:40-44. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2022-359-5-40-44
  14. Panin VA. Some indices of productivity of purebred and crossbred bulls. Herald of Beef Cattle Breeding. 2014;3(86):25-31.
  15. Batanov SD, Starostina OS, Atnabayeva NA, Lekomtsev MM, Dyakin SI. Commercial dairy cattle cross breeding as the main reserve of obtaining high-quality beef. Dairy and Beef Cattle Farming. 2022;5:13-16. doi: 10.33943/MMS.2022.37.23.003
  16. Seitov MS, Levitskaya TT. Maintenance, feeding and comparative assessment of growth indicators of bulls of different genotypes. Izvestia of Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2021;1(87):256-260. doi: 10.37670/2073-0853-2021-87-1-256-260
  17. Tagirov KhKh, Nikolaeva NYu, Andriyanova EM. Slaughter indicators of bulls and steers of the Hereford breed in the Tomsk region conditions. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2021;104(2):24-32. doi: 10.33284/2658-3135-104-2-24
  18. Khardina YeV, Krasnova OA. Slaughter and meat qualities of the Black Spotted bulls, due to the modern approach to feeding. Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University. 2016;9(143):124-124.
  19. Shagaliev FM. Meat productivity and quality indicators of beef bulls of different genotypes. Zootechny. 2022;2:34-38. doi: 10.25708/ZT.2022.94.37.009
  20. Shevkhuzhev AF, Ulimbashev MB, Ulimbasheva RA. Growth dynamics of Brown Swiss and Kalmyk young cattle under the conditions of distant highland pastures. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2016;6(62):139-141.
  21. Gorlov IF, Nikolaev DV, Kaydulina AA, Grishin VS, Mosolova DA. The efficiency of crossbreeding of the Red Steppe cows and bulls of the Kazakh white-headed breed for meat productivity increase and beef quality improvement. Animal Husbandry and Fodder Production. 2019;102(4):98-105.
 

Information about the authors:

Amash I Otarov, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Animal Husbandry and Forage Production, Institute of Agriculture - branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Federal Scientific Center" Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 224 Kirov St., Nalchik, 360004, tel.: 8-928-07910-53.

Foat G Kayumov, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Professor, Head of Research, Head of the Laboratory of New Breeds and Types of Beef Cattle, Federal Research Centre for Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8(3532)30-81- 76, tel.: 8-987-341-75-80.

Ruziya F Tretiyakova, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Researcher at the Breeding and Genetic Center for Beef Cattle, Federal Research Centre of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 9 Yanvarya St., Orenburg, 460000, tel.: 8(3532)30-81-74.

Murat B Ulimbashev, Dr. Sci. (Agriculture), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Industrial Technology of Livestock Production, North Caucasian Federal Scientific Agrarian Center, 49 Nikonov St., Mikhailovsk, 356241, tel.: 8-963-393-70-87.

 

The article was submitted 17.02.2023; approved after reviewing 20.04.2023; accepted for publication 13.06.2023.

Download